Table 4.

Summary of simulated impacts at the Kidderminster gauging station

Scenario – PWS abstraction offRecent actual rate (Ml/day)Flow impact at Kidderminster gauging station
LTAat Q95at Q99LTAat Q95at Q99
(Ml/day)(percentage of recent actual rate)
Dimmingsdale13.810.710.110.177.673.573.2
Ashwood18.217.515.015.995.982.687.4
Norton RCL4.33.42.83.079.364.769.1
Cookley13.212.211.211.692.584.887.8