Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Series home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current volume
    • All volumes
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Propose
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Series home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current volume
    • All volumes
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Propose

Comparing organic-hosted and intergranular pore networks: topography and topology in grains, gaps and bubbles

Matthew Andrew
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 484, 241-253, 3 September 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP484.4
Matthew Andrew
Carl Zeiss Microscopy4385 Hopyard Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The relationship between pore structures was examined using a combination of normalized topographical and topological measurements in two qualitatively different pore systems: organic-hosted porosity, common in unconventional shale reservoirs; and intergranular porosity, common in conventional siliciclastic reservoirs. The organic-hosted pore network was found to be less well connected than the intergranular pore network, with volume-weighted coordination numbers of 1.16 and 8.14 for organic-hosted and intergranular pore systems, respectively. This disparity in coordination number was explained by differences in the pore shapes that are caused by variations in the geological processes associated with the generation of the pore network. Measurements of pore shape showed that the pores in the organic-hosted network were both significantly more spherical and had a more positive curvature distribution than the pores present within the intergranular network. The impact of such changes in pore shape on pore-network connectivity was examined by creating a suite of synthetic pore geometries using both erosion/dilation of the existing network and image-guided object-based methods. Coordination number, Euler characteristic and aggregate porosity analyses performed on these synthetic networks showed that organic-type pore networks become connected at much higher aggregate porosities (35–50%) than intergranular-type pore networks (5–10%).

The last five years has seen a dramatic change in the nature and genesis of the petroleum systems driving the worldwide hydrocarbon market, with an increasing emphasis on unconventional resources, particularly artificially stimulated shale reservoirs. Over the last ten years production from onshore shale formations has expanded greatly, increasing from around 1.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) per day in 2007 to around 15.8 tcf per day in 2015, contributing approximately 60% of US day-to-day natural gas production (EIA 2017). The recent success of shale gas has caused a dramatic shift in global energy prices by greatly increasing global hydrocarbon supply. In this new low hydrocarbon price environment, technology must be made more efficient and reservoir management more targeted for unconventional petroleum systems to remain competitive relative to mature conventional resources. The flow processes governing recovery are governed at the scale of the tiny tortuous porous pathways through which the flow occurs, and so an understanding at this scale is critical for understanding upscaled reservoir behaviour.

Pore-scale imaging has developed over the last 20 years from a primarily academic technique used to visualize pore structures for fundamental research into an increasingly crucial industrial tool. High-resolution imaging is today used for the characterization of a range of geological and petrophysical properties, including porosity and pore connectivity (e.g. Fredrich et al. 1995), absolute and relative permeability (e.g. Andrä et al. 2013), mineralogy (e.g. Lai et al. 2015), geomechanical response (e.g. Fonseca et al. 2012), geological facies type, and diagenetic history (Vos et al. 2014), and while much progress has been made, many challenges remain (Blunt et al. 2013).

One particular area of interest is how differences in rock type, geological origin and diagenetic history impact the topology of the pore network, and, thus, single and multiphase flow and transport phenomena. It is these properties which ultimately govern and control variations in hydrocarbon production rates and recovery factors. The goal of this study is to compare two qualitatively different pore systems: those frequently found in conventional rocks, and those frequently found in unconventional reservoirs. Specifically, we examine the intergranular pore structures found in simple conventional sandstones and compare them to the organic-hosted ‘bubble’ pores frequently described in unconventional shale reservoirs (e.g. Loucks et al. 2012; Milliken et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2016). To perform this analysis we use classic pore-connectivity analysis (in the form of aggregate connectivity, coordination number and Euler characteristic distribution) and pore-shape analysis (in the form of pore sphericity and a novel geometrical curvature analysis), both on the real (imaged) geometries and synthetic geometries created using geometrical and object-based techniques.

An understanding of the contrast between these two pore structures is critical as intergranular pore structures dominate recovery from many classical clean reservoirs (e.g. Øren et al. 1998; Øren & Bakke 2002), whereas organic-matter pores can indicate strong reservoir storage capacities in shale reservoirs (e.g. Jiao et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2016; Ju et al. 2017) and contribute the most space for methane accumulation (Milliken et al. 2013).

Materials and methods

The two rock types compared in this study were Bentheimer Sandstone, an early Cretaceous high-porosity, high-permeability quartz arenite (Andrew et al. 2014c), and the Vaca Muerta Shale, a late Triassic–Early Jurassic economic low–intermediate maturity onshore Argentinian shale.

For the sandstone sample, the central portion of a micro-plug 10 mm in diameter and 50 mm in length was imaged using a ZEISS Versa XRM 520 X-ray microscope (Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Pleasanton, CA, USA). 3D volumes with a voxel size of 8.96 µm were reconstructed using a proprietary implementation of the Feldkamp–Davis–Kress (FDK) algorithm (Feldkamp et al. 1984) from a series of 1600 projections, sequentially acquired at equally spaced angular increments during a 360° rotation. Each projection consisted of 1024 × 1024 pixels and was reconstructed into a 3D volume of size 1024 × 1024 × 1024 voxels, representing a physical volume of 9.14 × 9.14 × 9.14 mm.

3D imaging of the shale pore network poses a significantly larger challenge than the conventional systems (Saif et al. 2017) due to its geological heterogeneity (Ringrose et al. 2008) at multiple scales. Frequently, the resolution required to resolve fundamental pore structures comes at the expense of a field of view representative of the heterogeneity inherent in real geological systems. This issue is particularly problematic in organic-rich shale reservoirs where pore structures range can from the millimetre to the sub-nanometre in scale. What is more, the organic-hosted porosity frequently governing hydrocarbon flow and recovery occurs at the smallest scales, only accessible using 3D imaging techniques such as focused ion beam–scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). The impact of scale in subsurface shale pore structures is complex (Ma et al. 2017), and thus the scope of this study was limited to examining the structure of organic-hosted ‘bubble’ porosity (Loucks et al. 2012; Milliken et al. 2013). All multiscale imaging was performed using the Atlas 5.2 correlative imaging platform.

A core-plug end trim 25 mm in diameter and 10 mm in thickness was first mechanically polished before being argon-ion milled for 20 min to produce a sample surface that was flat on the micrometre scale. It has been noted that such milling can change perceived sample maturity by imparting thermal energy to the surface of the sample (Mastalerz & Schieber 2017). The impact of such artificial maturation was reduced by minimizing both the end-trim thickness (10 mm: maximizing conductive heat loss through the ion beam stage) and the milling time (20 min: decreasing the total amount of thermal energy imparted to the sample).

The sample then was imaged in 2D across its entire surface with a pixel size of around 150 nm using a backscattered electron detector (BSD) on the ZEISS Crossbeam 540 (Fig. 1). This enabled the macroscopic heterogeneity of the sample to be fully described, and an organic-rich region to be identified. This sample was then imaged in 3D with a voxel size of 2.5 × 2.5 nm in the X and Y directions, and 5 nm in the Z direction.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Multiscale imaging of shale, starting with low resolution (150 nm) and moving to higher resolution (down to 2.5 nm).

One challenge when imaging porous materials using FIB-SEM is that of ‘pore backs’ – an artefact where out-of-plane information is visible, interfering with segmentation. The impact of this artefact is minimized when using a secondary electron (SE) detector. However, this has a much lower sensitivity to material contrasts (such as those between different minerals, or between the organic regions and the inorganic matrix) than a BSE detector. To resolve this problem, each image consisted of two image channels, acquired in parallel from an in-lens SE and energy selective backscatter (ESB) detector. These images were then blended to produce an image which both maximizes contrast and minimizes artefacts (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

(a) Slice through a 3D volume acquired using an in-lens SE detector, displaying limited material contrast and curtaining artefacts. (b) Same slice acquired using an ESB detector, displaying ‘pore back’ artefacts. (c) Blended image, showing both high material contrast and no curtaining artefacts.

This stack was approximately aligned using multiple chevron fiducials, following the technique outlined in Narayan et al. (2014), implemented within Atlas V 3D. A final automated stack alignment was performed in the ORS Dragonfly software package, creating a volume of size 2093 × 1760 × 606 voxels, representing a real physical volume of around 5.2 × 4.4 × 3.0 µm.

Machine-learning image segmentation is a new state-of-the-art technique that partitions challenging image datasets into segments (labels), representing different groups of features of the rock microstructure (e.g. pores or minerals), previously too difficult to separate using traditional techniques (Kan 2017). In this study we use ZEISS Zen Intellesis, an advanced tool which utilizes machine learning to construct a classifier from a range of different features extracted from the image, including local and non-local greyscale, gradient, and texture information. Once the classifier is trained, it can be used for segmenting the same or similar imaging data.

When compared with traditional techniques such as Otsu universal thresholding (Otsu 1979) or watershed-based region-growing algorithms (Jones et al. 2007) frequently used in digital rock-image processing (Schlüter et al. 2014), machine-learning techniques are more artefact and noise tolerant, frequently resulting in fewer misclassified voxels (Chauhan et al. 2016; Andrew et al. 2017). Both the XRM and FIB-SEM images were segmented using this machine-learning software into pore and grain in the case of the XRM dataset, and into pore, organic and mineral grain in the case of the FIB-SEM dataset. The image-processing workflow is shown below in Figure 3.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Image processing and segmentation. (a) Raw XRM image of quartz arenite (the pore space is the darkest phase and the mineral phases are the lighter phases). (b) The same slice segmented using machine learning. (c) 3D rendering of the segmented volume. (d) 2D slice through the FIB-SEM volume. (e) The same slice segmented using machine learning. (f) A 3D rendering of the resulting volume.

The resulting connected pore networks of the sandstone and the shale were then separated using a watershed algorithm to create a network of discreet, separated pores and throats (Beucher & Lanteujoul 1979; Wildenschild & Sheppard 2013; Rabbani et al. 2014; Andrew et al. 2015). While such algorithms have their limitations for complex pore networks (Raeini et al. 2017), those of relative geometrical simplicity can be separated using watershed relatively effectively (Baldwin et al. 1996; Lindquist & Venkatarangan 1999; Dong & Blunt 2009). These separated pore networks could then be examined for various geometrical, topological and topographical characteristics. First, the size of each pore was measured, both in terms of the volume of each individual pore and the radius of the largest possible sphere within the pore. This was the equivalent to the maximum of a Euclidian distance map evaluated through each pore. Network connectivity was then measured in two ways. A simple evaluation of network connectivity was calculated by measuring the relative contribution to the total porosity made by the largest connected cluster—this is termed ‘aggregate connectivity’. A more detailed analysis of connectivity was then computed by calculating both the distribution of pore coordination numbers (the number of pores connected to each pore) and the volume-weighted coordination number. Finally, pore shape was measured using pore sphericity and curvature.

Pore sphericity (Ψ) is shown by equation (1), where Vp is the object's volume and Ap is its surface area. Pore sphericity gives a volume-normalized, dimensionless measure of how close a particular component of the pore space is to an ideal sphere (with a sphere having a value of 1.0): Ψ=π1/3(6Vp)2/3Ap. (1)

Interface curvature has been used extensively to measure the shape of fluid–fluid and fluid–solid interfaces for the measurement of local capillary pressure (Armstrong et al. 2012; Andrew et al. 2014a, 2015) and grain shape (Andrew et al. 2014b). To measure curvature, a mesh of the segmented pore network was first created using a marching cubes technique. This mesh was smoothed using a Gaussian filter, before the mean curvature was measured at every point across the meshed surface. One challenge is how to compare interface curvature from pore structures which exist at different scales. To normalize across the different length scales, a dimensionless curvature measurement (Cn) (equation 1) was created by multiplying the mean curvature C¯ of each element on the surface (units m−1) by the volume-weighted average pore radius r¯ of the network, where Vp is a pore's volume and rp is its maximal inscribed radius. All these parameters were measured for all of the separated pores within each pore network:Cn=r¯C¯ (2) r¯=∑Vprp∑Vp. (3)

To investigate the intrinsic differences between different pore networks constructed from elements of different shapes, a suite of different synthetic pore structures was constructed to simulate the sort of pore networks expected in both organic regions (common in shales) and intergranular spaces (common in conventional reservoirs). These networks were constructed in two ways. The first technique involved either eroding (to decrease total porosity) or dilating (to increase total porosity) the existing pore networks until the desired porosity was reached. The second technique used to generate pore networks was an object-based approach where both types of pore network were generated in a way guided by the rock's geological origin. ‘Object-based’ approaches to pore-network generation refer to a group of techniques revolving around the treatment of geological bodies (e.g. mineral grains and pores) and processes (e.g. compaction and diagenesis) explicitly. Such approaches have a long and well-established history in digital rock technology (Bakke & Øren 1997; Lerdahl et al. 2000; Øren & Bakke 2002); however, as imaging technologies improved their predominance as the primary tool for the identification of a pore network has declined (relative to direct imaging). They still retain a valuable role, however, in extrapolating and extending understanding generated using direct imaging through a wider range of conditions, for which they are used in this study.

The authigenic ‘bubble’ shapes present within the organic-hosted pore network were simulated by randomly placing differently sized spheres within a volume. The spheres’ volume distribution was given by the measured pore-volume distribution measured from the 3D FIB-SEM image. New pores were placed until the desired porosity was reached and allowed to overlap with existing pores within the network. The intergranular pore network was modelled as the spaces between convex polyhedra, randomly placed into the pore space.

The size distribution of these convex polyhedra was defined by the grain-size distribution of the original geometry, defined using the same watershed technique used for pore-network analysis, only applied to the grain network (Fonseca et al. 2012; Andrew 2015). Multiple total porosity networks were created by randomly placing new grains until the desired porosity was reached. These different networks were then analysed to see the relationship between connectivity and aggregate porosity.

The networks created using object-based techniques were then further analysed, first to assess their statistical similarity to the original images, then to assess the trends present in the suites of synthetic networks. To do this analysis, coordination-number distributions were assessed on each of the synthetic networks. To examine trends within the network series, each of normalized frequency distributions was modelled using a Poisson distribution: Fn=e−λλNcNc! (4) where Fn is the normalized frequency of pores occurring at a coordination number Nc. λ, the sole free parameter in the distribution, corresponds to the average coordination number. The Poisson distribution is a useful tool for modelling the distribution of coordination numbers as it matches the observed pore-network coordination-number distributions well, it is asymmetrical (like the observed distributions) and it is simple, aiding an intuitive interpretation.

To mitigate uncertainty in any conclusions drawn on the relationship between network structure and connectivity introduced by the network separation algorithm, the Euler characteristic was also used to assess the evolution of connectivity over the network series. The Euler characteristic is a topological invariant, classically defined for polyhedra, given by: χ=V−E+F (5) where χ is the Euler number, V is the number of vertices, E is the number of edges and F is the number of faces. As it is topologically invariant, it can be extended to examine the topology of any 3D object by polygonizing the surface of the (segmented) voxelized image. Generally, a more negative Euler characteristic corresponds to a geometry with more connecting strands within it (it is better connected), whereas a more positive Euler number corresponds to a geometry with fewer connecting strands (it is more poorly connected). A major disadvantage of using the Euler number is that it is extremely challenging to normalize between individual instances of differing geometries, and as such it has been largely used when looking at trends within 3D geometries evolving due to some processes (e.g. the evolution of non-wetting-phase topology during multiphase fluid flow: Herring et al. 2013, 2014). This makes it unsuitable for a comparison between the original images on their own but perfect for a comparison between the trends observed in two suites of (synthetically created) geometries. In order to compare the Euler characteristic distribution between the two network types, the distributions were normalized to a range of 0–1 using their maximum and minimum values.

Multiple connectivity metrics (aggregate connectivity, coordination number and Euler characteristic) were used in the network analyses due to their complementary advantages and disadvantages. As such, their agreement gives a greater confidence in any resulting conclusions.

All geometry creation was performed in GeoDict software (Math2Market GmbH).

Results and discussion

The sandstone had a measured image porosity of 22.6%, of which the largest connected cluster contributes 99.98% of the volume. The shale had a measured porosity of only 5.37%; however, this porosity was exclusively hosted within the organic matrix, which made up 25.01% of the rock, meaning the pore space and organics together make up 30.38%. The porosity therefore makes up 17.68% of the volume of the organic-hosted region; however, its largest connected cluster only makes up 6.52% of the overall pore network. This is in contrast to the intergranular network, which was extremely well connected, with the largest connected organic cluster contributing 99.64% to the total pore volume (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Connectivity in intergranular porosity (a) and organic-hosted ‘bubble’ porosity (b). The total pore network is shown in green, and the largest connected cluster shown in red. A mostly red rendering corresponds to a well-connected pore network, whereas a mostly green rendering corresponds to a poorly connected network.

This difference in connectivity is even more pronounced when looking at the distribution in pore coordination numbers (the number of pores that each pore is connected to) (Fig. 5). Organic-hosted pores have a volume-weighted coordinated number of just 1.16, so each voxel within the network belongs to a pore which is only, on average, connected to just over one pore. In contrast, the intergranular pore network has a volume-weighted coordination number of 8.14, consistent with existing measurements of pore networks in siliciclastic quartz arenites (Andrew et al. 2014c).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Coordination-number distribution in intergranular and organic-hosted pore structures.

The relatively poor connectivity of the organic-hosted network can be explained by the differences in pore topography (caused by different geological processes associated with pore-network genesis), and the impact that this has on network connectivity. The differences in pore topography (shape) can be investigated by computing two properties from the images – sphericity and pore curvature. The pores within the organic-hosted pore system are significantly more spherical than those within the intergranular pore network, with modal sphericities of 0.6 and 0.3, respectively (Fig. 6). This trend can be understood by examining the normalized curvature distribution of the two pore networks (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Sphericities of organic and intergranular pores.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Curvature maps for intergranular (a) and organic-hosted (b) pore systems. Overall distributions (c) of the different networks show that the organic-hosted porosity has a significantly higher curvature than the intergranular network.

While both intergranular and organic-hosted pore structures exhibit convex and concave regions of the pore space, the organic-hosted normalized pore-curvature distribution is significantly more positive than the intergranular curvature distribution, with mean curvatures of 0.95 and 2.14, respectively. In the intergranular pore structure, the concave regions of the pore space correspond to the regions where large polyhedral grains bulge into the pore network, whereas the convex regions of the network correspond to pore corners, where multiple grains are touching, causing the direction of the pore wall to rapidly change direction. This shape, caused by the nature of deposition and diagenesis within the intergranular pore network, leads to the creation of abundant long, thin regions of the pore structure which connect one pore body to the next – pore throats (Fig. 8a). They are formed by the spaces left between matrix grains bulging into the pore space. The organic-hosted porosity, in contrast, has a much more convex (positive curvature) shape, with its surface bulging out into the surrounding matrix. In contrast to intergranular porosity (formed as the negative to the result of a deposition and diagenesis of the grain matrix), organic-hosted porosity is authigenic (forming in place during the maturation of the organic matrix). As the organic matrix is deformable, the hosted fluid tends to form a quasi-spherical shape (explaining the observed trends in pore sphericity). While the formation of this structure is complex, and the pores may then be deformed by other diagenetic processes, they retain their characteristic positive overall surface curvatures. In this case, connectivity only occurs when these pores overlap during growth, leading to a relatively poorly connected matrix (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Typical pore bodies from (a) an intergranular pore system, showing multiple long thin connecting pore throats and (b) a ‘bubble’ pore system common in organic regions in shales.

To explore the impact of these differences in pore-body shape, suites of synthetic pore systems were created for both the intergranular and organic-hosted pore systems using both the dilation and erosion of the existing network and object-based techniques (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Synthetic pore networks created by modelling (a) intergranular pore networks, as the spaces between overlapping convex polyhedral, and (b) organic-hosted pore networks, as overlapping spheres. Total porosity in each case is shown as a percentage. The total pore network is shown in green, with the largest connected cluster shown in red. A mostly red rendering represents a well-connected network, whereas a mostly green rendering represents a poorly connected network.

The pore coordination-number distribution was used to assess the statistical similarity between the networks created using object-based techniques and the real (imaged) networks. To do this, a network was generated to a target porosity given by the original (imaged) pore networks, and pores separated and identified, with good agreement between the coordination numbers being found (Fig. 10). Connectivity of the simulated networks was first assessed by measuring the contribution made to the overall porosity by the largest connected cluster (Fig. 11a). The transition between a poorly connected pore network and a well-connected pore network occurs at porosities of between 5 and 10% in the intergranular pore network, and between 35 and 50% in the organic pore network, with the trends created by both network generation algorithms (object based and erosion/dilation) being consistent. The trends in average coordination number and Euler characteristic distribution show very similar results. The characteristic coordination number (Fig. 12a) of the intergranular pore system reaches a value greater than 3 at 5% aggregate porosity, whereas the same number is only reached at a porosity of 50% in the organic-hosted pore system. Similarly, when examining the distribution within the Euler characteristic (Fig. 12b), values transition from their maximum values to their minimum values between 5 and 15% total porosity in the intergranular network, and between 35 and 50% in the organic-hosted network. All metrics of network connectivity are consistent with the originally imaged networks and with each other, showing that organic-hosted pore networks are significantly less well connected at a given porosity than their equivalent intergranular network.

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

Coordination-number distributions in both real (green) and synthetic (blue) geometries for (a) organic-hosted and (b) intergranular pore networks. Modelled Poisson distributions are shown as solid lines.

Fig. 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 11.

(a) The contribution to total porosity of the largest connected cluster for a range of simulated pore geometries. Real measurements are shown as points. (b) The normalized contribution to volume for pores of a range of equivalent pore radii (in units of voxels).

Fig. 12.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 12.

Connectivity evolution, as measured using the Euler characteristic (a) and the average network coordination number (b), for organic-hosted (red) and intergranular (blue) pore systems. Pore networks generated using erosion/dilation techniques have square markers, and networks generated using object-based techniques have triangular markers. The imaged networks (from which the erosion/dilation series are created) are indicated using circles.

One potential source of additional hydraulic connectivity in real systems is sub-resolution porosity. This is of particular concern in the organic-hosted pore system, where connectivity is poor and pore sizes in such systems have been reported to the nanometre (or even sub-nanometre) scale (Nelson 2009). To assess the impact of such porosity on these systems, the ‘resolvedness’ of the imaged network was examined by looking at contributions to the total network volume of pores (separated using watershed techniques) of varying equivalent radii (measured in voxels) (Fig. 11b). A dominant contribution of pores at or close to the voxel size would suggest a significant volumetric component of the porosity below the resolution of the image. This analysis showed that for the organic-hosted pore geometry (imaged at the nanometre scale using FIB-SEM) pores around 10 voxels across contributed the most to the total volume of the network (corresponding to an equivalent radius of 12.5 nm). In the sandstone, pores with an equivalent radius of around 13.5 voxels across contributed the most to the total volume of the network (corresponding to an equivalent radius of 121 µm). This indicates that in both systems the pores are well resolved and the lack of connectivity in the shale cannot simply be explained by the finite resolution of the image.

The similarity in connectivity trends between networks generated using different approaches (object-based approaches and erosion/dilation routines), as well as the statistical similarity (in terms of coordination-number distribution), give confidence that the object-based approaches are effectively capturing the geological processes that are important to the generation of pore-network connectivity. This causal relationship between pore-network generation and connectivity is critical, as it implies that connectivity in authigenic porosity will not occur until much higher porosity values than we would expect in conventional settings. In traditional formulations of multiphase flow, network connectivity is critical to both hydrocarbon recovery (Wardlaw & Cassan 1978; Herring et al. 2013) and single-phase flow (with Navier–Stokes-based fluid flow requiring a well-connected pore structure). These reservoirs, however, do produce in abundance and such a behaviour may be explained by other physical processes such as diffusion through and/or geomechanical deformation of the organic matrix, contributing significantly to overall hydrocarbon transport. The relative impact of these processes would be an interesting target for future work.

The size and extent of organic-hosted pore networks is strongly related to the thermal maturity of the host shale, with immature shales (0.5% < Ro < 1.5%) displaying few organic-hosted pores, shales of intermediate maturity (1.5% < Ro < 3%) displaying a large number of organic-hosted pores and highly mature shales (Ro > 3%) displaying a small number of organic-hosted pores (Tissot et al. 1974, 1987; Wang et al. 2016). As a shale matures, organics are converted into hydrocarbons in situ, with hydrocarbons being principally retained within the organic matrix (Milliken et al. 2013; Tian et al. 2013, 2015). As hydrocarbon generation proceeds, however, a greater proportion of organic matter is converted into hydrocarbon, increasing organic-matter porosity. This gradually increases the connectivity of the hydrocarbon ‘bubbles’, ultimately causing connected pathways to form and allowing the hydrocarbons to escape from the system. The resulting reduction in pore pressure then causes the collapse and depletion of the organic matter (Zhao et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2018). The relatively poor connectivity of organic-hosted pore networks could explain how relatively high hydrocarbon concentrations can be reached without the hydrocarbons escaping from the system – a percolating pathway is not available until high organic-hosted porosities. Once these have been reached (at high maturities) the hydrocarbon is able to migrate away from the system, causing the collapse of the pore network.

Conclusions

The relationship is described between topology, shape and aggregate porosity of two qualitatively different pore networks: intergranular pores, common within simple conventional siliciclastic reservoirs; and organic-hosted pores, common in unconventional shale reservoirs. These pore networks, existing on very different scales, were compared through the use of dimensionless measurements (coordination number, sphericity and normalized curvature). The two networks showed a large difference in connectivity, with a volume-weighted coordination number of 8.14 for the intergranular network and 1.16 for the organic-hosted network. The variation in connectivities is explained by differences in pore shape that are caused by fundamentally differing geological formation processes. This was investigated by examining the connectivity of multiple series of synthetic networks, generated both by the erosion and dilation of the original networks, and using object-based approaches (which implicitly model these processes). The synthetic networks generated using object-based techniques were statistically similar to the original network images. Aggregate connectivity, coordination number and Euler characteristic analyses all showed that the intergranular pore networks were significantly better connected at a given porosity than the organic-hosted network at the same porosity, with intergranular pore structures typically connecting at aggregate porosities of 5–10% and organic-hosted pore structures connecting at aggregate porosities of 35–50%.

Common reservoir rocks exhibit a much wider range of pore systems than the intergranular and relatively simple organic-hosted networks examined in this study, with shales possessing significant additional pore populations that may add significantly to overall connectivity. The techniques for linking real (imaged) pore networks and artificial (simulated) networks could be applied across this broad range of pore geometries to generate a more general understanding of the relationship between a rock's depositional environment, geological origin and diagenetic history.

Acknowledgements

I thank Zeiss Microscopy and Math2Market GmbH for the equipment and software access required for this work. I gratefully acknowledge Dr Lori Hathon, Dr Lorenz Lechner and Dr Sreenivas Bhattiprolu for the discussion of shale rock analysis. Many thanks to Dr Hannah Menke for help in the preparation of this paper.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  • © 2018 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

References

  1. ↵
    Andrä H., Combaret N. et al. 2013. Digital rock physics benchmarks – part II: Computing effective properties. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 33–43.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Andrew M., Bijeljic B. & Blunt M.J. 2014a. Pore-by-pore capillary pressure measurements using X-ray microtomography at reservoir conditions: curvature, snap-off, and remobilization of residual CO2. Water Resources Research, 50, 8760–8774.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Andrew M., Bijeljic B. & Blunt M.J. 2014b. Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography. Advances in Water Resources, 68, 24–31.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Andrew M., Bijeljic B. & Blunt M.J. 2014c. Pore-scale imaging of trapped supercritical carbon dioxide in sandstones and carbonates. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 22, 1–14.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Andrew M.G. 2015. Reservoir-Condition Pore-Scale Imaging of Multiphase Flow. Imperial College, London.
  6. ↵
    Andrew M.G., Menke H.P., Blunt M.J. & Bijeljic B. 2015. The imaging of dynamic multiphase fluid flow using synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography at reservoir conditions. Transport in Porous Media, 110, 1–24.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Andrew M.G., Bhattiprolu S., Butnaru D. & Correa J. 2017. The usage of modern data science in segmentation and classification: machine learning and microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 23, 156–157.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Armstrong R.T., Porter M.L. & Wildenschild D. 2012. Linking pore-scale interfacial curvature to column-scale capillary pressure. Advances in Water Resources, 46, 55–62.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Bakke S. & Øren P.-E. 1997. 3-D pore-scale modelling of sandstones and flow simulations in the pore networks. SPE Journal, 2, 136–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Baldwin C.A., Sederman A.J., Mantle M.D., Alexander P. & Gladden L.F. 1996. Determination and characterization of the structure of a pore space from 3D volume images. Journal of Colloid Interface Science, 181, 79–92.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Beucher S. & Lanteujoul C. 1979. Use of watersheds in contour detection. In: International Workshop on Image Processing: Real-Time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, 17–21 September 1979, Rennes, France.
  12. ↵
    Blunt M.J., Bijeljic B. et al. 2013. Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 197–216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Chauhan S., Rühaak W. et al. 2016. Processing of rock core microtomography images: Using seven different machine learning algorithms. Computers & Geosciences, 86, 120–128.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Chen Q., Zhang J., Tang X., Li W. & Li Z. 2016. Relationship between pore type and pore size of marine shale: An example from the Sinian–Cambrian formation, upper Yangtze region, South China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 158, 13–28.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Dong H. & Blunt M.J. 2009. Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images. Physical Review E, 80, 036307.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    EIA. 2017. International Energy Outlook 2017 Overview. IEO2017. United States Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.
  17. ↵
    Feldkamp L.A., Davis L.C. & Kress J.W. 1984. Practical cone-beam algorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 612.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Fonseca J., O'Sullivan C., Coop M.R. & Lee P.D. 2012. Non-invasive characterization of particle morphology of natural sands. Soils and Foundations, 52, 712–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Fredrich J.T., Menéndez B. & Wong T.F. 1995. Imaging the pore structure of geomaterials. Science, 268, 276–279.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Herring A.L., Harper E.J., Andersson L., Sheppard A., Bay B.K. & Wildenschild D. 2013. Effect of fluid topology on residual nonwetting phase trapping: implications for geologic CO2 sequestration. Advances in Water Resources, 62, 47–58.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Herring A.L., Andersson L., Newell D.L., Carey J.W. & Wildenschild D. 2014. Pore-scale observations of supercritical CO2 drainage in Bentheimer sandstone by synchrotron X-ray imaging. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 25, 93–101.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Jiao K., Yao S., Liu C., Gao Y., Wu H., Li M. & Tang Z. 2014. The characterization and quantitative analysis of nanopores in unconventional gas reservoirs utilizing FESEM-FIB and image processing: an example from the lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale, upper Yangtze region, China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 128–129, 1–11.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Jones A.C., Arns C.H., Sheppard A.P., Hutmacher D.W., Milthorpe B.K. & Knackstedt M.A. 2007. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. Biomaterials, 28, 2491–2504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Ju Y., Gong W., Chang C., Xie H., Xie L. & Liu P. 2017. Three-dimensional characterisation of multi-scale structures of the Silurian Longmaxi shale using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy and reconstruction technology. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 46, 26–37.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Kan A. 2017. Machine learning applications in cell image analysis. Immunology and Cell Biology, 95, 525–530.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Lai P., Moulton K. & Krevor S. 2015. Pore-scale heterogeneity in the mineral distribution and reactive surface area of porous rocks. Chemical Geology, 411, 260–273.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Lerdahl T., Oren P.E. & Bakke S. 2000. A predictive network model for three-phase flow in porous media. In: Proceedings of the SPE DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 3–5 April, 2000, Tulsa, OK, USA.
  28. ↵
    Lindquist W.B. & Venkatarangan A. 1999. Investigating 3D geometry of porous media from high resolution images. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 24, 593–599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Loucks R.G., Reed R.M., Ruppel S.C. & Hammes U. 2012. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bulletin, 96, 1071–1098.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Ma L., Fauchille A.-L., Dowey P.J., Figueroa Pilz F., Courtois L., Taylor K.G. & Lee P.D. 2017. Correlative multi-scale imaging of shales: a review and future perspectives. In: Rutter E.H., Mecklenburgh J. & Taylor K.G. (eds) Geomechanical and Petrophysical Properties of Mudrocks. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 454, 175–199, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP454.11
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Mastalerz M. & Schieber J. 2017. Effect of ion milling on the perceived maturity of shale samples: implications for organic petrography and SEM analysis. International Journal of Coal Geology, 183, 110–119.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Milliken K.L., Rudnicki M., Awwiller D.N. & Zhang T. 2013. Organic matter-hosted pore system, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania. AAPG Bulletin, 97, 177–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Narayan K., Danielson C.M. et al. 2014. Multi-resolution correlative focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy: applications to cell biology. Journal of Structural Biology, 185, 278–284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Nelson P.H. 2009. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales. AAPG Bulletin, 93, 329–340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Øren P.E. & Bakke S. 2002. Process based reconstruction of sandstones and prediction of transport properties. Transport in Porous Media, 46, 311–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Øren P.E., Bakke S. & Arntzen O.J. 1998. Extending predictive capabilities to network models. SPE Journal, 3, 324–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9, 62–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Rabbani A., Jamshidi S. & Salehi S. 2014. An automated simple algorithm for realistic pore network extraction from micro-tomography images. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 123, 164–171.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Raeini A.Q., Bijeljic B. & Blunt M.J. 2017. Generalized network modeling: network extraction as a coarse-scale discretization of the void space of porous media. Physical Review E, 96, 013312.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    Ringrose P.S., Martinius A.W. & Alvestad J. 2008. Multiscale geological reservoir modelling in practice. In: Robinson A., Griffiths P., Price S., Hegre J. & Muggeridge A. (eds) The Future of Geological Modelling in Hydrocarbon Development. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 309, 123–134, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP309.9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Saif T., Lin Q., Butcher A.R., Bijeljic B. & Blunt M.J. 2017. Multi-scale multi-dimensional microstructure imaging of oil shale pyrolysis using X-ray micro-tomography, automated ultra-high resolution SEM, MAPS Mineralogy and FIB-SEM. Applied Energy, 202, 628–647.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    Schlüter S., Sheppard A., Brown K. & Wildenschild D. 2014. Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: a review. Water Resources Research, 50, 3615–3639.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Tian H., Pan L., Xiao X., Wilkins R.W.T., Meng Z. & Huang B. 2013. A preliminary study on the pore characterization of Lower Silurian black shales in the Chuandong Thrust Fold Belt, southwestern China using low pressure N2 adsorption and FE-SEM methods. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 48, 8–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    Tian H., Pan L., Zhang T., Xiao X., Meng Z. & Huang B. 2015. Pore characterization of organic-rich Lower Cambrian shales in Qiannan Depression of Guizhou Province, Southwestern China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 62, 28–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    Tissot B., Durand B. & Es J. 1974. Influence of nature and diagenesis of organic matter in formation of petroleum. AAPG Bulletin, 58, 499–506.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  46. ↵
    Tissot B.P., Pelet R. & Ungerer P. 1987. Thermal history of sedimentary basins, maturation indices, and kinetics of oil and gas generation. AAPG Bulletin, 71, 1445–1466.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  47. ↵
    Vos K., Vandenberghe N. & Elsen J. 2014. Surface textural analysis of quartz grains by scanning electron microscopy (SEM): from sample preparation to environmental interpretation. Earth-Science Reviews, 128, 93–104.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Wang P., Jiang Z., Ji W., Zhang C., Yuan Y., Chen L. & Yin L. 2016. Heterogeneity of intergranular, intraparticle and organic pores in Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin, South China: evidence from SEM digital images and fractal and multifractal geometries. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 72, 122–138.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Wang Y., Wang L., Wang J., Jiang Z., Jin C. & Wang Y. 2018. Characterization of organic matter pores in typical marine and terrestrial shales, China. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 49, 56–65.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    Wardlaw N.C. & Cassan J.P. 1978. Estimation of recovery efficiency by visual observation of pore systems in reservoir rocks. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 26, 572–585.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  51. ↵
    Wildenschild D. & Sheppard A.P. 2013. X-ray imaging and analysis techniques for quantifying pore-scale structure and processes in subsurface porous medium systems. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 217–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    Zhao W., Li J., Yang T., Wang S. & Huang J. 2016. Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43, 547–559.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this volume

Geological Society, London, Special Publications: 484 (1)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Volume 484
2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Comparing organic-hosted and intergranular pore networks: topography and topology in grains, gaps and bubbles

Matthew Andrew
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 484, 241-253, 3 September 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP484.4
Matthew Andrew
Carl Zeiss Microscopy4385 Hopyard Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Comparing organic-hosted and intergranular pore networks: topography and topology in grains, gaps and bubbles

Matthew Andrew
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 484, 241-253, 3 September 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP484.4
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Geological Society, London, Special Publications article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing organic-hosted and intergranular pore networks: topography and topology in grains, gaps and bubbles
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Geological Society, London, Special Publications
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and methods
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Funding
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • The history of the European oil and gas industry (1600s–2000s)
  • Introduction to Himalayan tectonics: a modern synthesis
  • Contributions to the history of geomorphology and Quaternary geology: an introduction
  • Fifty years of the Wilson Cycle concept in plate tectonics: an overview
  • Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential
More...

Special Publications

  • About the series
  • Books Editorial Committee
  • Submit a book proposal
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0305-8719
Online ISSN 
2041-4927

Copyright © 2021 Geological Society of London