Abstract

Quantitative patterns in the sedimentary rock record predict many different macroevolutionary patterns in the fossil record, but the reasons for this predictability remain uncertain. There are two competing, but non-mutually exclusive, hypotheses: (1) similarities reflect a sampling bias imposed by variable and incomplete sampling of fossils, and (2) similarities reflect environmental perturbations that influence both the patterns of sedimentation and macroevolution (i.e., common-cause). Macrostratigraphy, which is based on the quantitative analysis of hiatus-bound rock packages, permits variation in the rock record to be expressed in terms of rock quantity and, more importantly, spatiotemporal continuity. In combination with spatially-explicit fossil occurrence data in the Paleobiology Database, it is now possible to more rigorously test alternative hypotheses for similarities in the rock and fossil records and to start distinguishing between geologically-controlled sampling bias and the common-cause hypothesis. Here we summarize results from measuring the intersection of Macrostrat and the Paleobiology Database. Our results suggest that patterns in the fossil record are not dominated by large-scale stratigraphic biases. Instead, they suggest that linkages between multiple Earth systems are driving both spatiotemporal patterns of sedimentation and macroevolution.