Abstract

The common claim that dolomitization creates 12% porosity is based on the mole-for-mole replacement equation. However, in the past 50 years, data have been collected demonstrating that dolomitization does not create porosity. Instead, dolostones inherit the porosity and fabric of the precursor limestone, and porosity is reduced by overdolomitization. The porosity of the precursor limestone depends on the diagenetic history up to the time of dolomitization. Data show that: (1) carbonates are born with high porosity and lose porosity gradually over a long period; and (2) mud-dominated fabrics compact more readily than grain-dominated fabrics. The problem of estimating the time of dolomitization is minimized by confining observations to young limestones and associated dolostones. Limited data from Holocene dolomitic sediments suggest no change in porosity with dolomitization. Study of Plio-Pleistocene carbonates in Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles, demonstrates that precursor limestones are more porous than dolostones. Limestones average 25% porosity, whereas dolostones average 11% porosity. Data from the Neogene of the Great Bahama Bank show that dolostones and adjacent limestones both have 40% porosity. Porosity studies of the Jurassic Arab D Formation show that dolostones and associated grain-dominated limestones have similar porosity ranges and that the decrease in porosity with increasing dolomitization results from compaction of the mud-dominated fabrics. These data suggest that porosity in dolostone is not created by a mole-for-mole replacement mechanism. Instead, dolostone porosity is: (1) inherited from the precursor limestone; and (2) occluded by the process of overdolomitization. Palaeozoic dolostones, however, are commonly more porous than juxtaposed limestones. The explanation for this observation is that limestones lose porosity through compaction and cementation, whereas dolostones resist compaction and retain much of their porosity.

Permeability studies have demonstrated that dolomitization of grain-dominated limestones usually does not change porosity-permeability relationships. Instead, precursor limestone fabric controls pore-size distribution. The dolomite crystal size of a muddominated dolostone may, however, be larger than the carbonate mud size, improving the porosity-permeability relationship substantially. Hence, there is a predictable relationship between interparticle (grains or crystals) porosity, permeability, precursor grain size and dolomite crystal size.