Abstract
Recent plate tectonic models advocate assembly of Proterozoic Australia by tectonic processes that involved large-scale horizontal motions, whereas previous models suggested that the continent evolved as an essentially intact block of lithosphere. Geological and geochemical observations alone are insufficient to test whether the major cratonic blocks of Australia were together or widely separated during the Proterozoic; only palaeomagnetism can provide quantitative constraints on relative plate motions during the Precambrian. Despite deficiencies in the palaeomagnetic record for Proterozoic Australia, groups of overlapping palaeopoles for 1.7–1.8 and 1.5–1.6 Ga permit the North and West Australian cratonic assemblages to have occupied their present relative positions since at least c. 1.7Ga, and to have been joined to the South Australian cratonic assemblage since at least c. 1.5Ga. Nonetheless, additional geological, geochronological and palaeomagnetic data are required to test whether large oceans closed between any of the continental blocks.
- © The Geological Society of London 2003
Abstract
Recent plate tectonic models advocate assembly of Proterozoic Australia by tectonic processes that involved large-scale horizontal motions, whereas previous models suggested that the continent evolved as an essentially intact block of lithosphere. Geological and geochemical observations alone are insufficient to test whether the major cratonic blocks of Australia were together or widely separated during the Proterozoic; only palaeomagnetism can provide quantitative constraints on relative plate motions during the Precambrian. Despite deficiencies in the palaeomagnetic record for Proterozoic Australia, groups of overlapping palaeopoles for 1.7–1.8 and 1.5–1.6 Ga permit the North and West Australian cratonic assemblages to have occupied their present relative positions since at least c. 1.7Ga, and to have been joined to the South Australian cratonic assemblage since at least c. 1.5Ga. Nonetheless, additional geological, geochronological and palaeomagnetic data are required to test whether large oceans closed between any of the continental blocks.
- © The Geological Society of London 2003
Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.
INDIVIDUALS
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
LIBRARY USERS
Log in through your institution
Palaeomagnetic constraints on the Proterozoic tectonic evolution of Australia
