Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Extract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) FREE
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taymaz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dilek, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 291; p. 1-16;
DOI: 10.1144/SP291.1
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Articles

The geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: introduction

T. Taymaz1, Y. Yilmaz2 & Y. Dilek3

1 Department of Geophysical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, TR–34469, Istanbul, Turkey (e-mail: taymaz{at}itu.edu.tr)
2 Kadir Has University, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA

The complexity of the plate interactions and associated crustal deformation in the Eastern Mediterranean region is reflected in many destructive earthquakes that have occurred throughout its recorded history, many of which are well documented and intensively studied. The Eastern Mediterranean region, including the surrounding areas of western Turkey and Greece, is indeed one of the most seismically active and rapidly deforming regions within the continents (Fig. 1). Thus, the region provides a unique opportunity to improve our understanding of the complexities of continental tectonics in an actively collisional orogen. The major scientific observations from this natural laboratory have clearly been helping us to better understand the tectonic processes in active collision zones, the mode and nature of continental growth, and the causes and distribution of seismic, volcanic and geomorphological events (e.g. tsunamis) and their impact on societal life and civilization. The tectonic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean region is dominated by the effects of subduction along the Hellenic (Aegean) arc and of continental collision in eastern Turkey (Anatolia) and the Caucasus. Northward subduction of the African plate beneath western Turkey and the Aegean region is causing extension of the continental crust and volcanism in the overlying Aegean extensional province. Eastern Turkey has been experiencing crustal shortening and thickening as a result of northward motion of the Arabian plate relative to Eurasia and the attendant post-collisional magmatism (Taymaz et al. 1990, 1991a, b; McClusky et al. 2000, 2003; Dilek & Pavlides 2006, and references therein; Fig. 2). The resulting combination of forces (the ‘pull’ from the subduction zone to the west and ‘push’ from the convergent zone to the east) is causing the Turkish plate to move southwestward, bounded by strike-slip fault zones: the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) to the north and the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) to the south. Interplay between dynamic effects of the relative motions of adjoining plates thus controls large-scale crustal deformation and the associated seismicity and volcanism in Anatolia and the Aegean region (Taymaz et al. 2004).


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (195K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (a) Seismicity of the Eastern Mediterranean region and surroundings reported by USGS–NEIC during 1973–2007 with magnitudes for M>3 superimposed on a shaded relief map derived from the GTOPO-30 Global Topography Data taken after USGS. Bathymetry data are derived from GEBCO/97–BODC, provided by GEBCO (1997) and Smith & Sandwell (1997a, b). (b) Summary sketch map of the faulting and bathymetry in the Eastern Mediterranean region, compiled from our observations and those of Le Pichon & Angelier (1981), Taymaz (1990), Taymaz et al. (1990, 1991a, b); Saroglu et al. (1992), Papazachos et al. (1998), McClusky et al. (2000) and Tan & Taymaz (2006). Large black arrows show relative motions of plates with respect to Eurasia (McClusky et al. 2003). Bathymetry data are derived from GEBCO/97–BODC, provided by GEBCO (1997) and Smith & Sandwell (1997a, b). Shaded relief map derived from the GTOPO-30 Global Topography Data taken after USGS. NAF, North Anatolian Fault; EAF, East Anatolian Fault; DSF, Dead Sea Fault; NEAF, North East Anatolian Fault; EPF, Ezinepazari Fault; PTF, Paphos Transform Fault; CTF, Cephalonia Transform Fault; PSF, Pampak–Sevan Fault; AS, Apsheron Sill; GF, Garni Fault; OF, Ovacik Fault; MT, Mus Thrust Zone; TuF, Tutak Fault; TF, Tebriz Fault; KBF, Kavakbasi Fault; MRF, Main Recent Fault; KF, Kagizman Fault; IF, Igdir Fault; BF, Bozova Fault; EF, Elbistan Fault; SaF, Salmas Fault; SuF, Sürgü Fault; G, Gökova; BMG, Büyük Menderes Graben; Ge, Gediz Graben; Si, Simav Graben; BuF, Burdur Fault; BGF, Beysehir Gölü Fault; TF, Tatarli Fault; SuF, Sultandag Fault; TGF, Tuz Gölü Fault; EcF, Ecemis Fau; ErF, Erciyes Fault; DF, Deliler Fault; MF, Malatya Fault; KFZ, Karatas–Osmaniye Fault Zone.

 

Figure 2
Figure 2
View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (a) GPS horizontal velocities and their 95% confidence ellipses in a Eurasia-fixed reference frame for the period 1988–1997 superimposed on a shaded relief map derived from the GTOPO-30 Global Topography Data taken after USGS. Bathymetry data are derived from GEBCO/97–BODC, provided by GEBCO (1997) and Smith & Sandwell (1997a, b). Large arrows designate generalized relative motions of plates with respect to Eurasia (in mm a–1) (recompiled after McClusky et al. 2000). NAF, North Anatolian Fault; EAF, East Anatolian Fault; DSF, Dead Sea Fault; NEAF, North East Anatolian Fault; EPF, Ezinepazari Fault; CTF, Cephalonia Transform Fault; PTF, Paphos Transform Fault; CMT, Caucasus Main Thrust; MRF, Main Recent Fault. (b) Schematic map of the principal tectonic settings in the Eastern Mediterranean. Hatching shows areas of coherent motion and zones of distributed deformation. Large arrows designate generalized regional motion (in mm a–1) and errors (recompiled after McClusky et al. (2000, 2003). NAF, North Anatolian Fault; EAF, East Anatolian Fault; DSF, Dead Sea Fault; NEAF, North East Anatolian Fault; EPF, Ezinepazari Fault; CTF, Cephalonia Transform Fault; PTF, Paphos Transform Fault.

 

    Regional synthesis
 Top
 Regional synthesis
 Research themes
 References
 
Given its location in the Alpine–Himalayan orogenic belt, and at the collisional boundary between Gondwana and Laurasia, the geological history of the Aegean region and Anatolia involves the Mesozoic–Cenozoic closure of several Neotethyan oceanic basins, continental collisions and subsequent post-orogenic processes (e.g. Sengör & Yilmaz 1981; Bozkurt & Mittwede 2001; Okay et al. 2001; Dilek & Pavlides 2006; Robertson & Mountrakis 2006). The opening of oceanic branches of Neotethys commenced in the Triassic and they closed during the Late Cretaceous to Eocene time interval. The closure of Neotethyan basins is recorded by several suture zones (e.g. Vardar, Izmir–Ankara–Erzincan, Bitlis–Zagros, Intra-Pontide, Antalya sutures), along which Jurassic–Cretaceous ophiolites and mélanges are exposed (e.g. Sengör & Yilmaz 1981; Robertson & Dixon 1984; Dercourt et al. 1986; Stampfli 2000; Okay et al. 2001; Parlak et al. 2002; Elmas & Yilmaz 2003; Parlak & Robertson 2004; Robertson & Ustaömer 2004; Robertson et al. 2004a, b; Stampfli & Borel 2004; Bagci et al. 2005, 2006; Dilek et al. 2005; Çelik et al. 2006; Dilek & Thy 2006; Parlak 2006, and references therein). The polarity of subduction, the timing of ocean basin opening and closure, and the location of Neotethyan suture zones remain somewhat controversial. The destruction of oceanic basins was also accompanied and followed by: (1) Cretaceous to early Palaeocene arc magmatism (e.g. Pontide arc: Okay & Sahintürk 1997; Yilmaz et al. 1997); (2) development of accretionary-type forearc basins (e.g. Haymana–Polatli Basin; Koçyigit 1991; Tuz Gölü Basin, Görür et al. 1998); (3) late Palaeocene to Miocene and younger post-collisional magmatism (Aldanmaz et al. 2000; Keskin 2003; Boztug et al. 2004, 2006; Karsli et al. 2004; Aslan 2005; Innocenti et al. 2005; Altunkaynak & Dilek 2006); (4) the development of several blueschist belts (e.g. Late Cretaceous Tavsanli Zone in Turkey: Okay et al. 1998; Sherlock 1999; Çamlica metamorphic belt in NW Turkey: Okay & Satir 2000, and references therein; Eocene–Oligocene Cycladic blueschist belt in the central Aegean: Altherr et al. 1979; Avigad & Garfunkel 1989, 1991; Okrusch & Bröcker 1990; Jolivet et al. 1994, 2003; Avigad et al. 1997; Bröcker et al. 2004; Ring et al. 2001; Trotet et al. 2001; Bröcker & Pidgeon 2007; Lycian Nappes and Menderes Massif: Oberhänsli et al. 2001; Okay 2001; Rimmelé et al. 2003, and references therein; Bolkar Mountains in the Central Taurides: Dilek & Whitney 1997); (5) high- to low-grade metamorphism affecting larger areas.

The nappe translation and burial of large areas beneath advancing ophiolite nappes has resulted in regional metamorphism and consequent formation of crustal-scale metamorphic massifs, such as the Rhodope Massif, Strandja Massif, Cycladic Massif, Menderes Massif and Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (Sengör et al. 1984; Whitney & Dilek 1997; Bozkurt & Oberhänsli 2001a, b; Okay et al. 2001; Gautier et al. 2002; Whitney et al. 2003; Sengün et al. 2006; Bozkurt 2007, and references therein).

The closure of oceanic basins resulted in crustal thickening and subsequent post-orogenic extension and magmatism in the west (Aegean extensional system) and collisional intracontinental convergence in eastern Turkey and the Caucasus that still prevail in the region. The present-day configuration of the Aegean region is therefore the manifestation of three major structures: (1) the Hellenic–Cyprian subduction zone; (2) the dextral North Anatolian fault system (NAFS); (3) the sinistral East Anatolian fault system (EAFS). Along the Hellenic–Cyprian trenches the African plate is subducting NNE beneath the Anatolian plate at varying rates causing lithospheric tearing and intra-plate deformation (Dilek 2006). The NAFS and EAFS are world-class examples of intracontinental transform fault systems that intersect at a continental triple junction in northeastern Turkey (e.g. Bozkurt 2001; Sengör et al. 2005). The continuum of deformation along the NAFS and EAFS has resulted in the WSW extrusion of the intervening Anatolian plate onto the Eastern Mediterranean lithosphere, accompanied by its counter-clockwise rotation, between the converging Eurasian and Arabian plates (Rotstein 1984). The sinistral Dead Sea fault system (DSFS) facilitates the northward motion of Arabia and also plays an important role in the active tectonics of the region.

Subsequent to a series of continental collisions and the demise of the Neotethyan seaways, the Aegean region experienced roughly NNE–SSW-oriented extension since the latest Oligocene to Early Miocene times (Dilek 2006, and references therein). This region, the Aegean extensional system (AES), covers a large area that includes Greece, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Albania and SW Turkey and forms one of the most spectacular and best-studied continental extensional regions. The cause of the onset of extension is controversial and may be (1) slab retreat along the Aegean subduction zone and consequent back-arc extension, (2) collapse of an overthickened crust, (3) westward escape of Anatolia along its plate boundaries, the NAFS and EAFS, or (4) differential rates of convergence between NE-directed subduction of the African plate relative to the hanging-wall Anatolian plate; that is, rapid southwestward movement of Greece relative to Anatolia (e.g. McKenzie 1978; Dewey & Sengör 1979; Le Pichon & Angelier 1981; Rotstein 1984; Sengör et al. 1985; Sengör 1979, 1987; Dewey 1988; Jackson & McKenzie 1988; Kissel & Laj 1988; Taymaz et al. 1990, 1991a; Seyitoglu & Scott 1991, 1992; Taymaz & Price 1992; Bozkurt & Park 1994; Meulenkamp et al. 1994; Taymaz 1996; Saunders et al. 1998; Thomson et al. 1998; Koçyigit et al. 1999; Bozkurt 2000, 2003; McClusky et al. 2000, 2003; Yilmaz et al. 2000; Okay 2001; Doglioni et al. 2002; Purvis & Robertson 2004; Sato et al. 2004; Seyitoglu et al. 2004; Seyitoglu et al. 2004; Bozkurt & Sözbilir 2004, 2006; Purvis et al. 2005; and references therein).

The AES is currently under the influence of forces exerted by northward subduction of the African plate beneath the southern margin of the Anatolian plate along the Hellenic–Cyprean trenches and dextral slip on the North Anatolian fault system. The continental extension has expressed itself in two distinct structural styles:

  1. Rapid exhumation of deep-burial metamorphic rocks in the immediate footwall of currently low-angle brittle–ductile normal faults (detachment fault and metamorphic core complexes). The footwall deformation preserves evidence for a progressive transition from ductile to brittle where mylonites are overprinted by breccias and, in turn, by cataclasites. Exhumation was accompanied by synchronous deposition of continental red clastic sediments in the basin(s) located in the detachment hanging walls.
  2. Late stretching of crust and a consequent graben formation along Plio-Quaternary high-angle normal faults (the modern phase of extension or rift mode). Several core complexes (e.g. Rhodope, Cycladic, Kazdag, Menderes, Nigde core complexes: Lister et al. 1984; Dinter & Royden 1993; Gautier et al. 1993, 1999; Bozkurt & Park 1994; Gautier & Brunn 1994; Dinter et al. 1995; Vandenberg & Lister 1996; Whitney & Dilek 1997; Hetzel et al. 1998; Jolivet & Patriat 1999; Jolivet & Faccenna 2000; Lips et al. 2001; Bonev & Stampfli 2003; Ring et al. 2003; Gessner et al. 2004; Beccaletto & Steiner 2005; Bonev 2006; Bonev et al. 2006a, b; Bozkurt et al. 2006; Bozkurt 2007; Régnier et al. 2007, and references therein) and overprinting approximately east–west-trending grabens (e.g. Gulf of Corinth, Büyük Menderes and Gediz grabens) therefore form the most prominent elements of the AES.

The Aegean region is therefore considered as a perfect natural laboratory to study mechanisms of core-complex formation, synchronous basin evolution and subsequent graben formation during its post-collisional extensional tectonic evolution. The papers in this book shed some light on various aspects of this extensional tectonics of the Aegean region, but there are still many contentious issues concerning the origin, timing and evolution of Neogene crustal extension in this broad zone of convergence between Africa and Eurasia (see Taymaz & Price 1992; Taymaz 1993; Taymaz et al. 2004; Bozkurt & Mittwede 2005; Dilek & Pavlides 2006, and references therein for details).

The Aegean region is also characterized by widespread post-collisional magmatism expressed by extensive volcanic sequences, hypabyssal intrusions and granitoid bodies (Fytikas et al. 1976, 1984; Altherr et al. 1982; Bingöl et al. 1982; Innocenti et al. 1984, 2005; Güleç 1991; Seyitoglu et al. 1992, 1997; Hetzel et al. 1995a, b; Richardson-Bunbury 1996; Ercan et al. 1997; Yilmaz et al. 2001; Isik et al. 2003; Erkül et al. 2005; Ring & Collins 2005; Tonarini et al. 2005; Yücel-Öztürk et al. 2005; Aldanmaz 2006; Altunkaynak & Dilek 2006; Bozkurt et al. 2006; Pe-Piper & Piper 2006; Dilek & Altunkaynak 2007, and references therein). The extant data suggest that there may have been close temporal and spatial relationships between magmatism and subduction roll-back processes and/or Neogene continental extension in the Aegean region, where the age of volcanic activity becomes younger southwards. There are good examples of synextensional granites emplaced into the footwall rocks of detachment faults (i.e. Simav and Alasehir detachment faults), providing crucial evidence for the age of core-complex formation. Therefore, geochronology and thermochronological studies have recently concentrated on these granitoid bodies in the region (e.g. Ring & Collins 2005; Thompson & Ring 2006).

This introduction is aimed at presenting a synoptic overview of the regional geology and geophysics based on the existing literature, as well as outlining the results of recent literature on existing controversies about the tectonic and geodynamic evolution of the Aegean region. The geology of this region has been reviewed in a series of recent special publications, providing in-depth coverage of the extant data and models, and readers are referred to these publications for additional information (Robinson 1997; Gourgaud 1998; Bozkurt & Rowbotham 1999a, b; Durand et al. 1999; Bozkurt et al. 2000; Bozkurt & Mittwede 2001, 2005; Aksu et al. 2002, 2005; Akinci et al. 2003; Taymaz et al. 2004; Sengör et al. 2005; Bozkurt 2006; Dilek & Pavlides 2006; Robertson & Mountrakis 2006).


    Research themes
 Top
 Regional synthesis
 Research themes
 References
 
This Special Publication includes a wide range of contributions, illustrating both the diversity of study regions being actively researched and of techniques now available to investigate crustal deformation. It also complements the recent compilations on this region as listed above. Coverage ranges from the Levantine region in the east to SW Bulgaria in the west, with emphasis on the Aegean extensional province and the adjacent western part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone as well as the Hellenic and Cyprean subduction zones. We have grouped papers into the following key themes.

The Aegean Sea and the Cyclades

Katzir et al. review the tectonic position and field relations of major ultramafic occurrences in the Cyclades and document in detail the petrography and chemical compositions of ultramafic and associated rocks on the islands of Evvia, Naxos, Tinos and Skyros. They then discuss the origin and mode of emplacement of these rocks and the orogenic evolution of the Cyclades. Widespread serpentinization of most of the ultramafic rocks suggests denudation prior to reburial causing Alpine metamorphism. Relict mantle assemblages and mantle-like oxygen isotope ratios from Naxos meta-peridotites are attributed to the emplacement of these mantle rocks onto a continental margin via collision and subsequent high-pressure (HP) metamorphism (M1) at 550–650 °C and ≥14 kbar. The meta-basites of the Skyros and Evvian mélanges record M1 temperatures of 450–500 °C and 400–430 °C, respectively. Thus, from Evvia southeastwards progressively deeper (i.e hotter) levels of the subducted plate are exposed. Interestingly, temperatures of the M2 overprint also increase from Evvia through Skyros to Naxos. The diverse PT paths of the Cycladic blueschists are predicted by thermal modelling of tectonically thickened crust unroofed either by erosion or by uniform extension.

Mehl et al. present detailed structural data from the islands of Tinos and Andros documenting the exhumation of HP metamorphic rocks in the Cyclades. The data are consistent with localization of deformation and its progressive evolution whereby early ductile fabrics are superimposed by low-angle semi-brittle shear planes and, in turn, by steeply dipping late brittle structures. The authors also confirm the role of boudinage formation in localizing ductile–brittle transition and emphasize the continuum of strain from ductile to brittle domains during exhumation. One of the main conclusions of the paper is that the strain localization process depends on both rheological stratification and compositional heterogeneity.

Pe-Piper & Piper document the occurrence of Miocene igneous rocks on the island of Samos as part of a Late Miocene–Quaternary back-arc setting in the Aegean Sea. Three groups of Late Miocene igneous rocks are differentiated: (1) an intrusive complex of monzodiorite and minor granites; (2) potassic trachytes and minor rhyolite; (3) bimodal rhyolites and basalts. New K–Ar ages combined with existing geochronology and biostratigraphy suggest an ages of 10–11 Ma for the first two groups and 8 Ma for the bimodal volcanic rocks. Radiogenic isotope and trace element compositions suggest partial melting of an enriched garnet lherzolite mantle source for the origin of monzodiorite and basalt. The authors show that trachyte and monzodiorite rocks may have evolved by fractional crystallization of a parental magma similar to that of the younger basalt. Emplacement and eruption of the monzodiorite, minor granites, potassic trachytes and rhyolite are attributed to regional extension and listric faulting, whereas the younger basalt extrusion was probably associated with north–south strike-slip faulting that provided pathways for different types of mantle melts.

Piper et al. interpret marine seismic reflection profiles from around Santorini to show the distribution of active faults and the occurrence of submarine volcanic rocks interfingering with stratified basinal sediments in the south Aegean arc. Two distinct phases of recent volcanism appear to have taken place in the area: the 1.6 ka and 0.65–0.55 Ma Akrotiri episodes. Accordingly, the ages of subsurface submarine volcanic horizons of Santorini (lower and upper volcanic units) are estimated as latest Pliocene and the younger Akrotiri episode. Because Santorini is located at the intersection of several fault sets of different orientations (east–west, ENE–WSW and NE–SW) and different ages, Late Neogene basin subsidence and volcanism are interpreted to have resulted from changing fault patterns associated with the collision of the African and Aegean–Anatolian plates.

Bonev & Beccaletto document structural evidence on the latest Oligocene to Present extensional tectonics within a back-arc setting in the north Aegean above the Hellenic subduction zone. The data come from two distinct locations: eastern Rhodope–Thrace of Bulgaria–Greece and the Biga Peninsula of NW Turkey. The structural data from the metamorphic rocks are consistent with top-to-the-NNW–SSE- to NE–SW-directed extension in dome-shaped core complexes in the footwalls of low-angle detachment faults. The results of this study combined with the available literature from other parts of the Aegean region suggest that the extensional history in the region comprises syn- and post-orogenic episodes during the Paleocene–Eocene and the latest Oligocene–Early Miocene, respectively. The former event was attributed to gravitationally induced hinterland-directed exhumation of the orogenic stack during the closure of the Vardar Ocean, whereas the latter was the consequence of widespread back-arc extension. The recognition of southward migration of extension and magmatism from the Rhodope complex in the north to the present position of the Hellenic trench in the south supports subduction roll-back processes that have prevailed in the region since Late Cretaceous time.

Georgiev et al. report the results of recent global positioning system (GPS) campaigns aimed at monitoring and studying the active deformation in SW Bulgaria. The analyses of GPS data for the 1996–2004 period provide firm evidence for active faulting in the region. The region is divided, based on geology and geodetic data from 38 GPS sites, into five blocks of homogeneous kinematic behaviour with average motions varying between 1.3 and 3.4 mm a–1. The rate of motion for the whole region is c. 1.8±0.7 mm a–1 in a N154° direction (to the SSE) with respect to the stable Eurasia; this result correlates well with the geological data on neotectonic motions in SW Bulgaria.

The Hellenic and the Cyprus arcs region

Karagianni & Papazachos present a database of regional earthquakes recorded by a portable broadband three-component digital station and a shear velocity model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the Aegean area using simultaneous inversion of Rayleigh and Love waves. The results are consistent with strong lateral variations of the S-wave velocities for the crust and uppermost mantle in the Aegean. The authors confirm the presence of thin crust (<28–30 km) for the whole Aegean Sea region and even thinner (20–22 km) crust in the southern and central Aegean Sea. On the other hand, the crust on land is much thicker, around 40–45 km in western Greece and a mean of 35 km in the rest of the country. A significant sub-Moho upper mantle low-velocity zone (LVL mantle) identified in the southern and central Aegean Sea correlates well with the high heat flow in the mantle wedge above the subducted slab and with the related active volcanism in the region.

Meier et al. investigate the structure and dynamics of the plate boundary in the area of Crete by receiver function, surface wave and microseismicity using temporary seismic networks, and summarize the results with special emphasis on their implications for geodynamic models. The authors then propose that the island of Crete represents a horst structure in the central forearc of the retreating Hellenic subduction zone. The reported properties of the lithosphere and the plate interface beneath Crete are attributed to extrusion of material from a subduction channel, driving differential uplift of the island by several kilometres since about 4 Ma.

Yolsal et al. inspect historical tsunamis known to have occurred in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea region identified from verified catalogues in three groups and correlate them with the seismogenic zones such as the Hellenic and the Cyprus arcs, the left-lateral strike-slip Dead Sea Fault and the Levantine rift. The authors conduct numerical simulations involving the initiation and propagation of tsunami waves as series of large sea-waves of extremely long wavelength and period generated by an impulsive undersea disturbances or activity near the coasts (i.e. earthquake-induced tsunamis). The authors then compute water surface elevation distributions and theoretical arrival times (i.e. calculated travel times) for the Paphos, Cyprus earthquake of 11 May 1222 and for the Crete earthquake of 8 August 1303, which are known to be the largest and well-documented tsunamigenic events in the region. The authors confirm that the coastal topography, sea bottom irregularities and near-shore bathymetry are crucial components in tsunami wave simulations, and they further suggest that improvement of the resolution of bathymetric maps, particularly for the details of the continental shelf and seamounts, would facilitate a better understanding of tsunami generation and tsunami-prone mechanisms.

Structural complexities associated with strike-slip faulting in Anatolia

Ergin et al. report on the influences of the Late Quaternary tectonics and sea-level changes on sedimentation in the Sea of Marmara, as observed in the Sarköy Canyon in the western part of this sea. They present the results of detailed sedimentological work on several sediment cores collected from this submarine canyon. The work is also supported by the interpretation of seismic section profiles and 14C dating of base sections in the sediment cores. The dated sediments (12 ka BP) marked the shift of depositional environment from lacustrine to the present marine conditions. The change of grain size from sand- to gravel-sized particles at the base to siliciclastic mud upwards in the succession is interpreted to mark changes in the Pleistocene–Holocene conditions. The widespread occurrences of faults, synsedimentary structures and submarine slides or slumps interpreted on seismic profiles form the most important records of active tectonics in the canyon and prove once more the major role of faulting and associated deformation on sedimentation in the Sea of Marmara.

Taymaz et al. investigate the seismotectonics of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) in the vicinity of the Orta–Çankiri region (central Turkey) by analysing a moderate-sized (Mw=6.0) earthquake that occurred on 6 June 2000. The authors correlate source rupture characteristics of this event with those obtained from the field mapping (neotectonic) and geodetic (InSAR) studies. The authors then discuss the faulting in this anomalous earthquake in relation to the local geometry of the main strike-slip system (NAF), and speculate that this event may not be a reliable guide to the regional strain field in NW central Turkey. The authors tentatively suggest that one possible explanation for the occurrence of the 6 June 2000 Orta–Çankiri earthquake could be localized clockwise rotations as a result of shearing of the lower crust and lithosphere.

Gürsoy et al. stress the importance of travertine occurrences in the study of active faulting, as these deposits are commonly linked to earthquake activity during which geothermal reservoirs are reset and activated by earthquake fracturing. They study the palaeomagnetic record of three travertine fissures in the Sicak Çermik geothermal field near Sivas in central Anatolia to understand the ambient field at the time of deposition and to identify cycles of secular variation of the geomagnetic field, with the aim of estimating the rate of travertine growth. The travertines are dated by the U–Th method and vary in age between 100 and 360 ka. The authors analyse sequential samples collected from the margins (earliest deposition) to the centres (last deposition) of fissure travertines and conclude, based on the assumption that these cycles record time periods of 1–2 ka, that travertine layers identify resetting of the geothermal system by earthquakes with magnitudes of 4.5–5.5 at every 50–100 years. Travertine precipitation appears to have occurred at rates of 0.1–0.3 mm a–1. The data are also consistent with the occurrence of major earthquakes (M c. 7.5) at approximately every 10 ka.

The majority of the papers in this thematic book were presented at the International Symposium on the Geodynamics of Eastern Mediterranean: Active Tectonics of the Aegean, held at the Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey, during 15–18 June 2005. This meeting was organized in memory of Professor Kâzim Ergin (1915–2002), a source of pride for the Istanbul Technical University. Kâzim Ergin (Mehmet Kâzim Ergin), known to his colleagues and students as Kâzim Hoca, was a Turkish geophysicist whose theoretical and experimental research contributed to many aspects of solid earth geophysics (Taymaz 2002, 2004). He was also an important figure in advancing the teaching of geosciences in Turkey in the decades after World War II, both as an instructor and as an administrator. Ergin served in high-level administrative capacities in various institutions. After the establishment by the government in 1963 of the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK), he was one of the early appointees to its engineering research group. He was eventually elected chairman of the Scientific Board of TÜBITAK, a capacity in which he served until he retired in 1979. Ergin also served as a director of the Istanbul Technical University; as a member of the NATO Science Committee Executive Council and of its Scientific Board; as a member of the Executive Council of the European Science Foundation (where he was Turkey's first representative); and as an Executive Council rapporteur for the UNESCO Working Group on Seismicity and Seismotectonics. He died on 24 November 2002 on Teachers' Day, an annual holiday in Turkey. He shall always be remembered as one of the pioneering figures in the development of Earth Sciences in Turkey, for his individual contributions as a university teacher and administrator, and for his influence on his colleagues and students.


    Acknowledgments
 
The symposium was sponsored by Kadir Has University, the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK), the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TT/TÜBA-GEBIP/2001-2-17), the British Council, the Geological Society of London, the Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Foundation, the Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO), and Gemini-Club Tourism. The editors would like to thank the members of the Organizing Committee and the staff and students at Kadir Has University who ensured the smooth running of the June 2005 symposium. Thanks are due to J. Turner (Series Editor) for his continuous encouragement, help and comments during the preparation of this volume, to the Geological Society Publishing House for editorial work, and to Angharad Hills for her continuous help at every stage of production of this volume. We are grateful to E. Bozkurt, C. Yaltirak and S. Yolsal for their help with editorial work and with the preparation of individual chapters in the book. Critical scholarly evaluation of scientific papers published in this Special Publication was no small task. We are most grateful to the referees for their dedicated and objective work, constructive criticism and suggestions, which collectively improved the quality of this book and helped us maintain high scientific standards. We finally thank the contributors to this book for their time and effort, and active participation in producing this exciting volume on the geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia.


    References
 Top
 Regional synthesis
 Research themes
 References
 

Akinci, Ö., Robertson, A. H. F. Poisson, A. & Bozkurt, E. 2003. The Isparta Angle, SW Turkey—its role in the evolution of Tethys in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Geological Journal, 38, 191–394.[CrossRef][ISI]

Aksu, A. E., Yaltirak, C. & Hiscott, R. N. 2002. Quaternary paleoclimatic–paleoceanographic and tectonic evolution of the Marmara Sea and environs. Marine Geology, 190, 1–552.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Aksu, A. E., Hall, J. & Yaltirak, C. 2005. Miocene to Recent tectonic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean: new pieces of the old Mediterranean puzzle. Marine Geology, 221, 1–440.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Aldanmaz, E. 2006. Mineral–chemical constraints on the Miocene calc-alkaline and shoshonitic volcanic rocks of western Turkey: disequilibrium phenocryst assemblages as indicators of magma storage and mixing conditions. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 15, 47–73.[ISI][GeoRef]

Aldanmaz, E., Pearce, J. A. Thirlwall, M. F. & Mitchell, J. 2000. Petrogenetic evolution of late Cenozoic, post-collision volcanism in western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 102, 67–95.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Altherr, R., Schliestedt, M. Okrusch, M. et al. 1979. Geochronology of high-pressure rocks on Sifnos (Cyclades, Greece). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 70, 245–255.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Altherr, R., Kreuzer, H. Wendt, I. et al. 1982. A late Oligocene/early Miocene high temperature belt in the Attic–Cycladic crystalline Complex (S. E. Pelagonian, Greece). Geologische Jahrbuch, E23, 97–164.

Altunkaynak, S. & Dilek, Y. 2006. Timing and nature of postcollisional volcanism in western Anatolia and geodynamic implications. In: Dilek, Y. & Pavlides, S. (eds) Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia, Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 409, 321–351.

Aslan, Z. 2005. Petrography and petrology of the calc-alkaline sarihan granitoid (NE Turkey): an example of magma mingling and mixing. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 14, 183–207.

Avigad, D. & Garfunkel, Z. 1989. Low-angle faults above and below a blueschist belt: Tinos Island, Cyclades, Greece. Terra Nova, 1, 182–189.[GeoRef]

Avigad, D. & Garfunkel, Z. 1991. Uplift and exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic terrains—the example of the Cycladic blueschist belt (Aegean Sea). Tectonophyics, 188, 357–372.[CrossRef]

Avigad, D., Garfunkel, Z. Jolivet, L. & Azanòn, J. M. 1997. Back-arc extension and denudation of Mediterranean eclogites. Tectonics, 16, 924–941.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bagci, U., Parlak, O. & Höck, V. 2005. Whole-rock and mineral chemistry of cumulates from the Kizildag (Hatay) ophiolite (Turkey): clues for multiple magma generation during crustal accretion in the southern Neotethyan ocean. Geological Magazine, 69, 53–76.

Bagci, U., Parlak, O. & Höck, V. 2006. Geochemical character and tectonic environment of ultramafic to mafic cumulate rocks from the Tekirova (Antalya) ophiolite (southern Turkey). Geological Journal, 41, 193–219.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Beccaletto, L. & Steiner, C. 2005. Evidence of two-stage extensional tectonics from the northern edge of the Edremit Graben (NW Turkey). Geodinamica Acta, 18, 283–297.[GeoRef]

Bingöl, E., Delaloye, M. & Ataman, G. 1982. Granitic intrusions in western Anatolia: a contribution to the geodynamic evolution of this area. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 75, 437–446.[GeoRef]

Bonev, N. 2006. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the eastern Rhodope Massif (Bulgaria): basement structure and kinematics of syn- to postcollisional extensional deformation. In: Dilek, Y. & Pavlides, S. (eds) Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia, Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 409, 211–235.

Bonev, N. G. & Stampfli, G. M. 2003. New structural and petrologic data on Mesozoic schists in the Rhodope (Bulgaria): geodynamic implications. Comptes Rendus Géosciences, 335, 691–699.[CrossRef]

Bonev, N., Burg, J.-P. & Ivanov, Z. 2006a. Mesozoic–Tertiary structural evolution of an extensional gneiss dome—the Kesebir–Kardamos dome, eastern Rhodope (Bulgaria–Greece). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 95, 318–340.[CrossRef][ISI]

Bonev, N., Marchev, P. & Singer, B. 2006b. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology constraints on the Middle Tertiary basement extensional exhumation, and its relation to ore-forming and magmatic processes in the eastern Rhodope (Bulgaria). Géodinamica Acta, 19, 265–280.

Bozkurt, E. 2000. Timing of extension on the Büyük Menderes Graben, western Turkey and its tectonic implications. In: Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J. A. & Piper, J. D. A. (eds) Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 173, 385–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. 2001. Neotectonics, seismicity and earthquakes in Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 1–212.[CrossRef][ISI]

Bozkurt, E. 2003. Origin of NE-trending basins in western Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 16, 61–81.[CrossRef][ISI]

Bozkurt, E. 2006. Metamorphic terranes of the Aegean region. Geodinamica Acta, 19, 249–453.[ISI]

Bozkurt, E. 2007. Extensional vs contractional origin for the Southern Menderes Shear Zone, southwest Turkey: tectonic and metamorphic implications. Geological Magazine, 144, 191–210.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Mittwede, S. K. 2001. Introduction to the geology of Turkey—a synthesis. International Geology Review, 43, 578–594.[ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Mittwede, S. K. 2005. Introduction: evolution of Neogene extensional tectonics of western Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 18, 153–165.[GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Oberhänsli, R. 2001a. Menderes Massif: structural, metamorphic and magmatic evolution. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 679–882.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Oberhänsli, R. 2001b. Menderes Massif (western Turkey): structural, metamorphic and magmatic evolution—a synthesis. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 679–708.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Park, R. G. 1994. Southern Menderes Massif: an incipient metamorphic core complex in western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 151, 213–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Rowbotham, G. 1999a. Advances in Turkish Geology, Part I: Tethyan Evolution and Fluvial–Marine Sedimentation. Geological Journal, 34, 3–222.[CrossRef][ISI]

Bozkurt, E. & Rowbotham, G. 1999b. Advances in Turkish Geology, Part II: Magmatism, Micropalaeontology and Basin Evolution. Geological Journal, 34, 223–319.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Sözbilir, H. 2004. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine, 141, 63–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E. & Sözbilir, H. 2006. Evolution of the large-scale active Manisa fault, southwest Turkey: implications on fault development and regional tectonics. Geodinamica Acta, 19, 427–453.[GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J. A. & Piper, J. D. A. 2000. Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 173, 353–384.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J. A. Mittwede, S. K. & Ottley, C. J. 2006. Geochemistry and tectonic implications of leucogranites and tourmalines of the Southern Menderes Massif, southwest Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 19, 363–390.[GeoRef]

Boztug, D., Jonckheere, R. Wagner, G. A. & Yegingil, Z. 2004. Slow Senonian and fast Palaeocene–early Eocene uplift of granitoids in the central eastern Pontides, Turkey: apatite fission–track results. Tectonophysics, 382, 213–228.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Boztug, D., Erçin, A. I. Kuruçelik, M. K. Göç, D. Kömür, I. & Iskenderoglu, A. 2006. Geochemical characteristics of the composite Kaçkar batholith generated in a Neo-Tethyan convergence system, Eastern Pontides, Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 27, 286–302.[GeoRef]

Bröcker, M. & Pidgeon, R. T. 2007. Protolith ages of meta–igneous and metatuffaceous rocks from the Cycladic blueschist unit, Greece: results of a reconnaissance U–Pb zircon study. Journal of Geology, 115, 83–98.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bröcker, M., Bieling, D. Hacker, B. & Gans, P. 2004. High-Si phengite records the time of greenschist-facies overprinting: implications for models suggesting mega-detachments in the Aegean Sea. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 22, 427–442.[CrossRef][ISI]

Çelik, O. F., Delaloye, M. & Feraud, G. 2006. Precise Ar-40–Ar-39 ages from the metamorphic sole rocks of the Tauride Belt Ophiolites, southern Turkey: implications for the rapid cooling history. Geological Magazine, 143, 213–227.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Dercourt, J., Zonenshain, L. P. Ricou, L.-E. et al. 1986. Geological evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic to the Pamirs since the Lias. Tectonophysics, 123, 241–315.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Dewey, J. D. 1988. Extensional collapse of orogens. Tectonics, 7, 1123–1139.[ISI][GeoRef]

Dewey, J. F. & Sengör, A. M. C. 1979. Aegean and surrounding region: complex multiplate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 90, 84–92.

Dilek, Y. 2006. Collision tectonics of the Mediterranean region: causes and consequences. In: Dilek, Y. & Pavlides, S. (eds) Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean and Asia, Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 409, 1–13.

Dilek, Y. & Altunkaynak, S. 2007. Cenozoic crustal evolution and mantle dynamics of post-collisional magmatism in western Anatolia. International Geology Review, 49, 431–453.[ISI][GeoRef]

Dilek, Y. & Pavlides, S. 2006. Post-collisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean and Asia, Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 409.

Dilek, Y. & Thy, P. 2006. Age and petrogenesis of plagiogranite intrusions in the Ankara mélange, central Turkey. Island Arc, 15, 44–57.[GeoRef]

Dilek, Y. & Whitney, D. L. 1997. Counterclockwise PTt trajectory from the metamorphic sole of a Neo-Tethyan ophiolite (Turkey). Tectonophysics, 280, 295–301.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Dilek, Y., Shallo, M. & Furnes, H. 2005. Rift-drift, seafloor spreading, and subduction tectonics of Albanian ophiolites. International Geology Review, 47, 147–176.[ISI][GeoRef]

Dinter, D. A. & Royden, L. 1993. Late Cenozoic extension in northeastern Greece: Strymon valley detachment system and Rhodope metamorphic core complex. Geology, 21, 45–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Dinter, D. A., Macfarlane, A. M. Hames, W. Isachsen, C. Bowring, S. & Royden, L. 1995. U–Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Symvolon granodiorite: implications for the thermal and structural evolution of the Rhodope metamorphic core complex, northeastern Greece. Tectonics, 14, 886–908.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Doglioni, C., Agostini, S. Crespi, M. Innocenti, F. Manetti, P. Riguzzi, F. & Savasçin, Y. 2002. On the extension in western Anatolia and the Aegean Sea. Journal of Virtual Exploration, 8, 169–183.

Durand, B., Jolivet, L. Horváth, F. & Sérrane, M. 1999. The Mediterranean Basins: Tertiary Extension Within the Alpine Orogen, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 156.

Elmas, A. & Yilmaz, Y. 2003. Development of an oblique subduction zone—tectonic evolution of the Tethys suture zone in southeast Turkey. International Geology Review, 45, 827–840.[ISI][GeoRef]

Ercan, T., Satir, M. Sevin, D. & Türkecan, A. 1997. Bati Anadolu'daki Tersiyer ve Kuvarterner yasli kayaçlarda yeni yapilan radyometrik yas ölçümlerinin yorumu. Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute (MTA) of Turkey, 119, 103–112, [in Turkish with English abstract].

Erkül, F., Helvaci, C. & SözbIlIr, H. 2005. Stratigraphy and geochronology of the Early Miocene volcanics in the Bigadiç borate basin, western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 14, 227–253.[ISI][GeoRef]

Fytikas, M., Guiliano, O. Innocenti, F. Marinelli, G. & Mazzuoli, R. 1976. Geochronological data on recent magmatism of the Aegean Sea. Tectonophysics, 31, 29–34.[CrossRef]

Fytikas, M., Innocenti, F. Manetti, P. Mazuoli, R. Peccerillo, A. & Villari, L. 1984. Tertiary to Quaternary evolution of volcanism in the Aegean region. In: Dixon, J. E. & Robertson, A. H. F. (eds) The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 17, 687–700.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Gautier, P. & Brun, J.-P. 1994. Ductile crust exhumation and extensional detachments in the central Aegean (Cyclades and Evvia Islands). Geodinamica Acta, 7, 57–85.[ISI][GeoRef]

Gautier, P., Brun, J.-P. & Jolivet, J. 1993. Structure and kinematics of Upper Cenozoic extensional detachment on Naxos and Paros (Cyclades islands, Greece). Tectonics, 12, 1180–1194.[ISI][GeoRef]

Gautier, P., Brun, J.-P. Moriceau, R. Sokoutis, D. Martinod, J. & Jolivet, L. 1999. Timing, kinematics and cause of Aegean extension: a scenario based on comparison with simple analogue experiments. Tectonophysics, 315, 31–72.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Gautier, P., Bozkurt, E. Hallot, E. & Dirik, K. 2002. Pre-Eocene exhumation of the Nigde Massif, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Geological Magazine, 139, 559–576.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

GEBCO. 1997. General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, Digital Version. CD-ROM. British Oceanographic Data Centre, Birkenhead.

Gessner, K., Collins, A. S. Ring, U. & Güngör, T. 2004. Structural and thermal history of poly-orogenic basement: U–Pb gecohronology of granitoid rocks in the southern Menderes Massif, western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 161, 93–101.[Abstract/Free Full Text][ISI][GeoRef]

Görür, N., Tüysüz, O. & Sengör, A. M. C. 1998. Tectonic evolution of the Central Anatolian basins. International Geology Review, 40, 831–850.[ISI][GeoRef]

Gourgaud, A. 1998. Volcanism in Anatolia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 85, 1–537.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Güleç, N. 1991. Crust–mantle interaction in western Turkey: implications from Sr and Nd isotope geochemistry of Tertiary and Quaternary volcanics. Geological Magazine, 123, 417–435.

Hetzel, R., Passchier, C. W. Ring, U. & Dora, O. O. 1995a. Bivergent extension in orogenic belts: the Menderes Massif (southwestern Turkey). Geology, 23, 455–458.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Hetzel, R., Ring, U. Akal, C. & Troesch, M. 1995b. Miocene NNE-directed extensional unroofing in the Menderes Massif, southwestern Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 152, 639–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Hetzel, R., Romer, R. L. Candan, O. & Passchier, C. W. 1998. Geology of the Bozdag area, central Menderes Massif, SW Turkey: Pan-African basement and Alpine deformation. Geologische Rundschau, 87, 394–406.[GeoRef]

Innocenti, F., Kolios, N. Manetti, P. Mazzuoli, R. Peccerillo, A. Rita, F. & Villari, L. 1984. Evolution and geodynamic significance of Tertiary orogenic volcanism in northeastern Greece. Bulletin of Volcanology, 47, 25–37.[CrossRef]

Innocenti, F., Agostini, S. Di Vincenzo, G. Doglioni, C. Manetti, P. Savasçin, M. Y. & Tonarini, S. 2005. Neogene and Quaternary volcanism in western Anatolia: magma sources and geodynamic evolution. Marine Geology, 221, 397–421.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Isik, V., Tekeli, T. & Seyitoglu, G. 2003. Ductile–brittle transition along the Alasehir detachment fault and its structural relationship with the Simav detachment fault, Menderes Massif, western Turkey. Tectonophysics, 374, 1–18.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Jackson, J. & McKenzie, D. 1988. The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors and rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophysical Journal, 93, 45–73.[CrossRef][ISI]

Jolivet, L. & Faccenna, C. 2000. Mediterranean extension and the Africa–Eurasia collision. Tectonics, 19, 1095–1106.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Jolivet, L. & Patriat, M. 1999. Ductile extension and the formation of the Aegean Sea. In: Durand, B., Jolivet, L., Horváth, F. & Sérrane, M. (eds) The Mediterranean Basins: Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 156, 427–456.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Jolivet, L., Brun, J.-P. Gautier, P. Lallemant, S. & Patriat, M. 1994. 3-D kinematics of extension in the Aegean from the Early Miocene to the present, insights from the ductile crust. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 65, 195–209.

Jolivet, L., Faccenna, C. Goffé, B. Burov, E. & Agard, P. 2003. Subduction tectonics and exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic rocks in the Mediterranean orogen. American Journal of Science, 303, 353–409.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Karsli, O., Aydin, F. & Sadiklar, M. B. 2004. Magma interaction recorded in plagioclase zoning in granitoid systems, Zigana Granitoid, eastern Pontides, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 15, 287–306.

Keskin, M. 2003. Magma generation by slab steepening and breakoff beneath a subduction–accretion complex: an alternative model for collision-related volcanism in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 8046.[CrossRef]

Kissel, C. & Laj, C. 1988. Tertiary geodynamical evolution of the Aegean arc: a palaeomagnetic reconstruction. Tectonophysics, 146, 183–201.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

KoçyIgIt, A. 1991. An example of an accretionary fore-arc basin from central Anatolia and its implications for the history of subduction of Neo-Tethys in Turkey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103, 22–36.

KoçyIgIt, A., Yusufoglu, H. & Bozkurt, E. 1999. Evidence from the Gediz Graben for episodic two-stage extension in western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 156, 605–616.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Le Pichon, X. & Angelier, J. 1981. The Aegean Sea. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, Series A, 300, 357–372.[CrossRef]

Lips, A. L. W., Cassard, D. Sözbilir, H. & Yilmaz, H. 2001. Multistage exhumation of the Menderes Massif, western Anatolia (Turkey). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 781–792.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Lister, G. S., Banga, G. & Feenstra, A. 1984. Metamorphic core complexes of cordilleran-type in the Cyclades, Aegean Sea, Greece. Geology, 12, 221–225.[Abstract][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

McClusky, S., Balassanian, S. Barka, A. et al. 2000. Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 5695–5719.[CrossRef][GeoRef]

McClusky, S., Reilinger, R. Mahmoud, S. Ben-sari, D. & Tealeb, A. 2003. GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions. Geophysical Journal International, 155, 126–138.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

McKenzie, D. 1978. Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 55, 217–254.[ISI][GeoRef]

Meulenkamp, J. E., Van Der Zwaan, G. J. & Van Wamel, W. A. 1994. On Late Miocene to recent vertical motions in the Cretan segment of the Hellenic arc. Tectonophysics, 234, 53–72.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Oberhänsli, R., Partzsch, J. Candan, O. & Çetinkaplan, M. 2001. First occurrence of Fe–Mg-carpholite documenting a high-pressure metamorphism in metasediments of the Lycian nappes, SW Turkey. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 867–873.[CrossRef]