Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) FREE
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lugli, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 285; p. 1-13;
DOI: 10.1144/SP285.1
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Articles

Introduction and overview

B. C. Schreiber1, M. Babel2 & S. Lugli3

1 University of Washington, USA (e-mail: geologo@comcast.net)
2 Institute of Geology, Warsaw University, Al. Zwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland
3 Dipartimento di Scienze Della Terra, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Largo S. Eufemia 19, 41100 Modena, Italy

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This volume grew out of the various oral and poster presentations given during the ‘Evaporite’ session at the International Geological Union conference (2004) in Florence, Italy. It was clear that only a few of the participants or attendees, coming from many countries and various distant parts of the world, were well informed about evaporites outside their immediate area of study, apart from data from the most commonly available literature. Diversity in the languages of publication and the logistical difficulty of making first-hand comparisons acts as a major barrier to study. As a result, the basic concept of evaporites that most geologists have is that deposits are the product of simple, chemically controlled environments and, if evaporitic compounds are chemically the same, then it follows that their lithology and origin are also the same. Based on many studies over the past 30 years, it is now clear that this long-held impression is manifestly untrue. The disparities were very evident in the photographic presentations and descriptions at the 2004 International Geological Congress: the same evaporitic compounds can have distinct and diverse lithology, depositional sources and geological history. They cannot be considered to arise solely from simple, direct chemical origins as explained by a single universal model! This is the same paradigm of sedimentation that functions with other deposits, such as siliciclastics and carbonates, and should also apply to evaporites.

In putting this volume together, we realized there were many questions about evaporites from parts of the world not discussed in Florence, despite the large number of participants. Thus, in order to broaden and balance the topics already in our Congress program, we added two additional review papers. One paper that we have added is a chapter covering the many evaporites in the former Soviet Union territory: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. This . . . [Full Text of this Article]