Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beyer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 98; p. 149-159;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.098.01.08
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Palaeomagnetic Properties of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs

Results from a palaeomagnetic investigation of the Brent Group sediments in wells 34/10–16 and 34/10–17 showing evidence for complete remagnetization of the sediment

Claus Beyer

CB-Magneto A/S, PO Box 7015, Jorenholmen, N-4004 Stavanger, Norway

Cores from wells 34/10–16 and 34/10–17 in the Tampen Spur area, Norway were studied to establish a magnetic polarity stratigraphy for the Brent Group in the area. Approximately 100 samples from each well were treated by traditional thermal and alternating field demagnetization procedures and the apparent polarities determined. Thin sections were studied and scanning electron microscopy carried out with the purpose of verifying a primary origin of the remanent magnetization.

Correlation of the two wells based on the polarity logs was in agreement with the lithoand biostratigraphic correlations. However, the mineralogical analysis did not determine any primary magnetic minerals, although potential remanence carrying diagenetic minerals were observed. This, combined with magnetic data indicating extensive remagnetization of the sediment, lead to the conclusion that the remanent magnetization of these sediments is late diagenetic, probably of Tertiary age.

The results are not encouraging with respect to the use of palaeomagnetism as a chronostratigraphic tool for these sediments. It may, however, be useful for dating diagenetic events and, as a result of the strong secondary magnetization, magnetic orientation techniques can be successfully applied to the core material.