Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 97; p. 97-101;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.097.01.12
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Data Management

Project databases: standards and security

Stephen Henley

CSIRO Exploration & Mining, 39 Fairway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia

For technical applications in the mining industry, large institutional data models are the exception rather than the norm. Much more common, given the distributed nature of the business, and the scattered locations of the specialists involved, is the personal or project database. Such a database is set up for a project (or part of a project), and is developed using a data model defined specifically for that project. At the end of the project, the database may be archived or it may be supplied to a central group for integration with a corporate database. If uncontrolled, such methods of database management can lead either to direct drastic loss of data or to incompatibilities in data recording standards. The use of common software standards and data dictionaries throughout an organization can reduce radically these dangers and can produce positive benefits not only in data recovery but in reusability of techniques.