Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choukroune, P.
Right arrow Articles by Arndt, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 95; p. 67-86;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.095.01.05
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Soft lithosphere during periods of Archaean crustal growth or crustal reworking

P. Choukroune, H. Bouhallier & N. T. Arndt

Géosciences, UPR CNRS 4661, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France

Field observations, and an analysis of the strain field, have been carried out in Archaean terranes of the Hebei province in the Dharwar craton of India, the Sino-Korean craton in China, and the Man shield in the Ivory Coast.

Two broadly different situations can be recognized. In the Dharwar and Man Shields the deformation shows a range of characteristic features. The foliation trajectories outline dome-and-basin structures in which supracrustal rocks of greenstone belts invariably occupy the basins. The foliation trajectories are perturbed only by bands of transcurrent shearing. Variations in deformation directions depend essentially on the geometry of plutonic or migmatitic bodies within which the foliation invariably has a domal form. Changes in the intensity of deformation are essentially limited to boundaries between granitoids and supracrustal series. These changes are largely horizontal. Characteristics of the finite strain ellipsoid (the parameter k) vary extremely rapidly.

The second situation is manifested in the Hebei province where the Archaean crust has deformed without the preservation of domes and basins. Here the deformation is characterized by the presence of a foliation and a very strong vertical flattening which extends into catazonal domains. This deformation is homogeneous. To explain these observations it is proposed that this homogeneous deformation was superimposed on pre-existing dome-and-basin structure, obliterating the original geometry. The Hebei example represents a stage of deformation greater than that of the Ivory Coast, which in turn is greater than that in the India craton.

It is apparent that the Archaean crust has specific characteristics that controlled the manner in which it deformed. During accretion, or reworking, it was dominated by body forces related to differences in the densities of the two major Archaean lithological units: granitoid and greenstones. Deformation resulting from boundary forces then led to a second type of behaviour controlled by a vertical planar anisotropy induced during the first stage.

These characteristics are never reported in modern orogenic belts, which generally are marked by a uniform structural trend and vergence. It is proposed that Archean cratons completely lacked a rigid element during the accretion events responsible for their formation, that the thermal regime in these periods was quite unlike that of today, and that the continental crust formed or was reworked during episodes of enhanced mantle plume activity.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. R. Cruden, M. H. B. Nasseri, and R. Pysklywec
Surface topography and internal strain variation in wide hot orogens from three-dimensional analogue and two-dimensional numerical vice models
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 253: 79 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. F. Rey and G. Houseman
Lithospheric scale gravitational flow: the impact of body forces on orogenic processes from Archaean to Phanerozoic
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 253: 153 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J.-P. Brun, P. Cobbold, and D. Gapais
Dedication to Pierre Choukroune
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2005; 243: ix - x.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. G. Blenkinsop and A. F. M. Kisters
Steep extrusion of late Archaean granulites in the Northern Marginal Zone, Zimbabwe: evidence for secular change in orogenic style
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2005; 243: 193 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
W. Bleeker
Archaean tectonics: a review, with illustrations from the Slave craton
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 199: 151 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. Choukroune, J. N. Ludden, D. Chardon, A. J. Calvert, and H. Bouhallier
Archaean crustal growth and tectonic processes: a comparison of the Superior Province, Canada and the Dharwar Craton, India
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1997; 121: 63 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]