|
Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Leeds, Leeds SL2 9JT, UK
The simple physical models which are popularly used to describe deposition from turbidity currents are based on the notion of unidirectional waning flow, resulting in the familiar Bouma sequence (Ta-e) or its high-density counterpart, the Lowe sequence (S1-3). Most geologists working on turbidite successions know only too well how wide is the range of facies which do not fit into the standard facies models. The application of simple equations of motion shows that deposition can occur beneath flows that are steady or even waxing. The various combinations of different spatial and temporal accelerations produce markedly different vertical and lateral variations in the resulting turbidite. On these grounds alone, we should expect not one but at least five basic types of sequence in turbidite beds, for which likely candidates can be found in many deep water clastic systems. This has important implications for deposit geometry, gradients in reservoir properties, and geological interpretation and correlation of well cores. Since many basins are confined, a priori reasoning tells us to expect interactions between turbidity currents and topography, producing anomalous intrabed vertical sequences, multiple current directions and locally enhanced deposition. Flume experiments with radially spreading scaled sediment gravity flows demonstrate how the geometry of sandstone deposits may be controlled by topography. Interactions between the flow and topographic features are dependent upon the shape and orientation of the obstacle, and upon its size relative to the height of the flow. Some of the results are counter-intuitive, and may have significant impact on location of reservoir sands around basin-floor and marginal topography.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Whitham, J. R. Ineson, and D. Pirrie Marine volcaniclastics of the Hidden Lake Formation (Coniacian) of James Ross Island, Antarctica: an enigmatic element in the history of a back-arc basin Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 258: 21 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Pringle, A. R. Westerman, J. D. Clark, N. J. Drinkwater, and A. R. Gardiner 3D high-resolution digital models of outcrop analogue study sites to constrain reservoir model uncertainty: an example from Alport Castles, Derbyshire, UK Petroleum Geoscience, 2004; 10: 343 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. S. Al Ja'Aidi, W. D. McCaffrey, and B. C. Kneller Factors influencing the deposit geometry of experimental turbidity currents: implications for sand-body architecture in confined basins Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 222: 45 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gervais, B. Savoye, D. J. W. Piper, T. Mulder, M. Cremer, and L. Pichevin Present morphology and depositional architecture of a sandy confined submarine system: the Golo turbidite system (eastern margin of Corsica) Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 222: 59 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Broucke, F. Guillocheau, C. Robin, P. Joseph, and S. Calassou The influence of syndepositional basin floor deformation on the geometry of turbiditic sandstones: a reinterpretation of the Cote de L'Ane area (Sanguiniere-Restefonds sub-Basin, Gres d'Annot, Late Eocene, France) Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 221: 203 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Stanbrook and J. D. Clark The Marnes Brunes Inferieures in the Grand Coyer remnant: characteristics, structure and relationship to the Gres d'Annot Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 221: 285 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Lee, L. A. Amy, and P. J. Talling The character and origin of thick base-of-slope sandstone units of the Peira Cava outlier, SE France Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 221: 331 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Parize and G. Fries The Vocontian clastic dykes and sills: a geometric model Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 216: 51 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Tipper A fractionation model for sediment delivery Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 191: 161 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Smallwood and J. Maresh The properties, morphology and distribution of igneous sills: modelling, borehole data and 3D seismic from the Faroe-Shetland area Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 197: 271 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mulder, B. Savoye, D. J. W. Piper, and J. P. M. Syvitski The Var submarine sedimentary system: understanding Holocene sediment delivery processes and their importance to the geological record Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1998; 129: 145 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||