Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowell, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 88; p. 39-57;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.088.01.04
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Mechanics, Dynamics and Geometry of Basin Inversion

Mechanics of basin inversion from worldwide examples

James D. Lowell

, 2200 W. Berry Ave., Littleton, CO 80120, USA

Inversion is dependent on pre-existing basin configuration in the initial subsidence, usually extensional phase, and the resolution of compressional forces in the later shortening phase. External horizontal, rather than isostatic vertical forces are required for inversion because many deep sediment-filled basins around the world have never been inverted, but should have been, if isostatic rebound were the driving mechanism.

Inversion can range in scale from basins to sub-basins to selected structures within basins. Typically, rift basins can be later inverted. Mainly by reactivation of older normal faults, inversion selects rift basins where, in pure shear, weakening because of necking or thinning of lithosphere has occurred; and where, in simple shear, mechanical detachment surfaces are available for subsequent movement. Some pre-existing lows or sags can apparently be inverted in the absence of reactivated normal faults, as in the southern Altiplano of Bolivia and offshore Sabah, Borneo.

Basins can be inverted by dominantly strike-slip with some convergent component, e.g. offshore northeast Brazil, and by almost direct compression, Atlas Mountains, Morocco. A prime difference is that convergent strike-slip can reactivate relatively high-angle normal faults as reverse faults, whereas these faults tend to lock when subjected to more direct compression which then creates lower angle contractional faults. Usually, inversion is caused by a combination of compression and strike-slip (transpression) because the azimuth of maximum principal compressional stress to the direction of original basin trend vectors into an oblique-slip component. This is illustrated in northern Argentina where compression derived from Andean deformation is resolved obliquely (about 45°) against an older rift basin in the foreland nearby. Interestingly, for this area at least, the 45° angle which affords an equal contribution of strike slip and compression results only in reactivation of older normal faults and does not create younger contractional features.

Apparently compressive forces can be transmitted backward from the lead edge of an underthrusted foreland plate to invert rather remote regions and basins that are carried on that plate; this may be a significant part of the mechanism for basin inversion in northwest Europe and the southern North Sea as that foreland region underthrusted along the Alpine system.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. W. Hitzman
Extensional faults that localize Irish syndiagenetic Zn-Pb Deposits and their reactivation during Variscan compression
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1999; 155: 233 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]