Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huyghe, P.
Right arrow Articles by Mugnier, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 88; p. 339-353;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.088.01.19
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Case Studies: Europe

A comparison of inverted basins of the Southern North Sea and inverted structures of the external Alps

Pascale Huyghe1 & Jean-Louis Mugnier2

1 Département de Géologie et d’Océanographie, URA CNRS 197, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence cedex, France
2 Laboratoire de Géodynamique des Chaînes Alpines, URA CNRS 69, rue M. Gignoux, 38031 Grenoble cedex, France

For several years, the relationships between extensional and contractional features have been studied in detail by numerous authors, and structural rules suggested regardless of the size and the geodynamic context of the inverted structures. Examples from the external part of the Western Alps and its foreland follow these rules (oblique-slip reactivation, buttress effect of normal faults, short-cuts, preserved half-grabens beneath decollement, forced folds, etc.), but are not controlled by the same geodynamic conditions as intra-plate inverted basins. The Jura platform, which is not controlled by extensional tectonics, shows fault reactivation, buttress effects and preserved structures beneath the decollement. Inverted structures are nicely illustrated in the Dauphinois domain of the stretched western Tethyan margin, but the effect of lithospheric weakening inherited from the stretching was reduced at the time of the Neogene shortening, and the maximum burial is induced by nappe loading. Therefore the relative timing of inversion tectonics, maximum burial and maximum temperature are very different in the Bourg-d’Oisans half-graben of the Dauphinois domain than for intra-plate inverted basins of the Southern North Sea, e.g. the Broad Fourteens Basin. Nonetheless, fold structures overlapped by major unconformities developed during early deformation events in restricted areas of the Western Alps. The example of structures in the Devoluy is linked to the inversion of the Vocontian basin, and is followed by a renewal of subsidence prior to the later Alpine shortening. Therefore, the Alps provide geometrical field examples of the interaction between stretching and shortening events, and may give some insight into the geometry of structures on the seismic scale. Intra-plate inverted basins provide examples of folded and faulted structures overlapped by sediments and provide a means of explaining the early shortening events that occurred in the Western Alps which were not related to the alpine evolution.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. A. Stewart
Salt tectonics in the North Sea Basin: a structural style template for seismic interpreters
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 272: 361 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]