Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallam, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reinbold, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 84; p. 153-164;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.084.01.16
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Water and Gas Injection Methods

Performance evaluation and optimization of the Kuparuk hydrocarbon miscible water-alternating-gas flood

Richard J. Hallam1, Tuan D. Ma2 & Eric W. Reinbold2

1 BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., PO Box 196612, 900 E Benson Boulevard, Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612, USA
2 Arco Alaska, Inc., PO Box 100360, Anchorage, Alaska, 99510-0360, USA

In 1988 a hydrocarbon miscible water-alternating-gas (MWAG) pilot was initiated in the Kuparuk River field, on the North Slope of Alaska. Project decline curve analysis showed a significant response to the MWAG process. The field data alone, however, could not be used to accurately project the ultimate performance of the process. A systematic, integrated approach to reservoir modelling was used to evaluate the MWAG process performance. Finely gridded one dimensional (1D) models were used to evaluate the process mechanisms. Then fine and coarsely layered 2D and 3D compositional models were used to evaluate the process efficiency. The areal effects, including faulting, were then incorporated by using a 3D, coarsely gridded, multi-well, modified black oil (MBO) model. The 3D, site-specific, model was history-matched for the waterflooding period. The miscible flood performance was then predicted using a tuned MBO parameter and compared to the field performance. The 3D MBO model predicted that the ultimate incremental recovery would be 11 0.000000or a 30% HCPV slug. The model indicated that the miscible process can accelerate production of the waterflood reserves. The model was also used to evaluate the effects of total slug size, maturity of the preceding waterflood, and WAG ratio on the process efficiency.