Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalen, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kristensen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 84; p. 143-152;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.084.01.15
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Water and Gas Injection Methods

A WAG injection pilot in the Lower Brent Formation at the Gullfaks Field

Vilgeir Dalen1, Rune Instefjord2 & Reidar Kristensen2

1 Statoil, PO Box 300, N-4001 Stavanger, Norway
2 Statoil, Sandslihaugen 30, N-5020 Bergen, Norway

The Gullfaks Field is a large oilfield in the Norwegian Sector of the North Sea. The field is compartmentalized by a dense and complex fault pattern, and most of the oil is contained in poorly consolidated but high-quality reservoir sands. Production started in 1986, and waterflooding is the main recovery method. Water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection — or supplementary injection of gas in existing water injection wells — has been identified as a possible method for increasing and accelerating oil recovery from Gullfaks. To verify the potential of this technique, a WAG pilot was initiated in 1991. The target area for the gas was primarily one fault block where major water breakthrough had occurred. In this paper, relevant field observations are presented, and the effects of the WAG pilot injection on flow performance and recoveries are discussed on the basis of the field observations and a detailed, history-matched 3D simulation model for the pilot area. In the present case, the gas migrates rapidly towards the top of the formation and accumulates in secondary gas caps. Improved immiscible displacement of attic oil is the main benefit of gas injection in this case.