Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hazlett, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 84; p. 125-131;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.084.01.13
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Water and Gas Injection Methods

Soluble gas injection for waterflood profile modification

Randy Doyle Hazlett

Mobil Research and Development Corporation, Mobil Exploration and Producing Technical Center, 13777 Midway Road, Dallas TX 75244, USA

A method involving the addition of water-soluble gas to exploit relative permeability relationships is evaluated for its potential to modify a waterflood profile. In this process, a soluble gas is added to injected water in an amount such that a single-phase aqueous solution enters the formation; however, the bubble point pressure is crossed in the steeply varying pressure profile around an injector. Solution gas alters the relative permeability to water in those zones taking water. Thus, the current water injection profile transports profile modification agent to the zones which need it most. Analytical model results for the radial flow of dissolved gas and subsequent gas evolution indicate that gas saturation is partitioned according to the permeability-porosity ratio. For most cases, this results in beneficial profile modification by three-phase relative permeability effects. Relative permeability reduction by a factor of three is anticipated through the nucleation of a trapped gas saturation. Gas saturations accumulate with time, making the process more beneficial with continued implementation. Though initially this process yields a near-wellbore treatment, prolonged application produces a trapped gas zone deep into the reservoir. Gas evolution away from the injector aids in injectivity maintenance. Increase in microscopic displacement efficiency, in addition to volumetric sweep, is also expected. Nitrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide are screened as potential water-soluble additives.