Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottjer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Droser, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1995; v. 83; p. 7-26;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.083.01.02
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Palaeoecological models, non-uniformitarianism, and tracking the changing ecology of the past

David J. Bottjer1, Kathleen A. Campbell1, Jennifer K. Schubert2 & Mary L. Droser3

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33124, USA
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA

Palaeoecological models are commonly used by palaeontologists and sedimentary geologists to reconstruct ancient palaeoenvironments. In order to illustrate the ways in which palaeoecological models develop as new information is discovered, four examples are discussed: (1) reefs and fossil cold seeps; (2) biofacies models for strata deposited in ancient oxygen-deficient environments; (3) palaeoenvironmental distributions of post-Ordovician stromatolites; and (4) onshore-offshore trends of trace fossils. The development of physical sedimentological and geochemical criteria that can independently be used for evaluating ancient depositional environments provides a base line with which to assess palaeoecological change through geological time. Thus, the possibility now exists to free palaeoecological models and the study of ancient ecology from traditional uniformitarianism and Lyell’s dictum that the ‘present is the key to the past’, so that palaeoecological models may be developed which are useful for segments of time not anchored in the present. This approach will also be essential for evaluating the changing ecology of the past, which at present is only poorly understood. Future development and independent testing of such palaeoecological models will allow a more complete appreciation of the changing roles of environment, ecology and evolution in the history of life.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. D. Taylor and E. A. Glover
Functional anatomy, chemosymbiosis and evolution of the Lucinidae
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 177: 207 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]