Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herries, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1993; v. 73; p. 199-218;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.073.01.12
© 1993 Geological Society of London

Aeolian Reservoirs

Contrasting styles of fluvial-aeolian interaction at a downwind erg margin: Jurassic Kayenta-Navajo transition, northeastern Arizona, USA

Robert D. Herries

Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2UE, UK

Fluvial-aeolian interactions result from both short-term interplay between an ergmargin and adjacent fluvial system, and much longer-term expansion and contraction of the erg in response to climatic, tectonic or eustatic effects.

Near Moenkopi, in northeastern Arizona, a zone of intertonguing characterizes the transition between the fluvial Kayenta Formation and the overlying aeolian Navajo Sandstone. Three fluvial to aeolian drying-up cycles form the largest scale interaction and represent the repeated advance of the Navajo erg across the Kayenta alluvial plain, probably in response to an increasingly arid climate. During the aeolian phase of each cycle, small-scale interactions resulted from fore-erg deposition on the alluvial plain, and fluviallyfed interdunal flooding, which both occurred during periods of erg activity.

The top of each cycle marked a return to wetter climatic conditions which terminated erg activity, forming a stabilization surface. As a consequence, prograding fluvial systems were able to transgress the denuded surface, covering the area formerly occupied by the erg to form the base of the next drying-up cycle.

From a hydrocarbon reservoir viewpoint, the two types of interaction have contrasting geometries. Fluvial deposits of the large-scale cycles have regionally extensive sheet-like geometries and are likely to form widespread barriers to vertical flow. Small-scale interdunal flooding is less significant and forms ribbon-like baffles to flow which extend roughly parallel to the strike of the aeolian cross-strata. The key to differentiating each type of interaction lies in determining whether the fluvial syste coexisted with the active erg, or prograded as a result of erg stabilization.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
L. K. Richmond and B. P. J. Williams
A new terrane in the Old Red Sandstone of the Dingle Peninsula, SW Ireland
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 180: 147 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Howell and N. Mountney
Climatic cyclicity and accommodation space in arid to semi-arid depositional systems: an example from the Rotliegend Group of the UK southern North Sea
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1997; 123: 63 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]