Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pinheiro, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1993; v. 71; p. 15-34;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.071.01.02
© 1993 Geological Society of London

The lateral extent of sequence boundaries

J. A. Cartwright, R. C. Haddock & L. M. Pinheiro

Department of Geology, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BP, UK

Sequence boundaries, as defined by the Exxon group, are regionally extensive surfaces (basin-wide scales) that are characterized in part by stratal discontinuity surfaces in the form of onlap, downlap and toplap (Mitchum et al. 1977). The idea that sequence boundaries are so areally extensive is closely connected to the ideology favoured by the Exxon Group that sequence boundaries are eustatic in origin. This concept of sequence boundaries was initially based on seismic stratigraphic observations of stratal reflection geometry, but has now been extended to rock stratigraphic relationships in general. One of the important issues in sequence stratigraphy is to decide whether concepts based on the low resolution seismic method are applicable at much higher orders of resolution, such as in outcrop. This paper examines the stratigraphic conditions necessary for the development of regionally extensive and discrete surfaces of onlap, downlap and toplap. The main conclusions are that in order for onlap, downlap and toplap surfaces to develop as discrete surfaces there must be no contemporaneous sediment accumulation beyond the lap-out position. If this condition is not met, then discrete lap-out surfaces do not develop. Instead, closely-related families of surfaces that individually are of limited areal extent are more likely to form.

It is argued that in most depositional environments some form of sedimentation is likely to occur beyond the lap-out position. This suggests that sequence boundaries should only develop over extremely limited areas, and should not be expected to form regionally correlatable stratigraphic surfaces. The apparent regional extent of some sequence boundaries and their genetic linkage with eustatic changes is in conflict with predictions based on simple stratigraphic principles. The regional correlatability of sequence boundaries probably owes more to the limited resolution of seismic data and the map-driven need to correlate over large areas than to any physical continuity of a single surface.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
N. H. Woodcock, A. J. Butler, J. R. Davies, and R. A. Waters
Sequence stratigraphical analysis of late ordovician and early Silurian depositional systems in the Welsh Basin: a critical assessment
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 103: 197 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]