Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dreyer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1992; v. 69; p. 135-174;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.069.01.07
© 1992 Geological Society of London

Geometry and facies of large-scale flow units in fluvial-dominated fan-delta-front sequences

Tom Dreyer

Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Sandsliveien 90, 5020, Bergen, Norway

In heterogeneous reservoirs, an optimal number of large-scale flowunits (here termed building blocks) must be defined prior to detailed geological modelling. For the fluvial-dominated fan-deltaic parts of the Tilje Formation, Mid-Norwegian shelf, four fan-delta-front building blocks have been defined. Quantifications with regard to the geometry and spatial arrangement of these building blocks have been made based on outcrop studies of similar sediments in the Ridge Basin, California. The four building blocks are composite delta-front units (CDF), mouth-bar sandstones (MS), mouth-bar-related mudstones and carbonate-cemented zones (MMC), and distal delta-front mudstones (D). The main reservoir units in the Tilje Formation are the composite delta-front units. These have large lateral extents (tens of kilometres), and occur in three intervals separated by impermeable zones of building block D. Within the CDF units, the main heterogeneity is the alternation between permeable mouth-bar sandstones of building block MS and impermeable zones of building block MMC. The mouthbar sandbodies have width (W)/thickness (T) ratios of 220–525, and constitute a considerably larger percentage of the reservoir volume than the less widespread MMC flow-barriers. Hence, the internal communication within the CDF units is believed to be generally good.