Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morton, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1992; v. 61; p. 227-244;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1992.061.01.13
© 1992 Geological Society of London

Provenance of Brent Group sandstones: heavy mineral constraints

A. C. Morton

British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK

Heavy mineral suites in Brent Group sandstones have been heavily influenced by hydraulic and diagenetic processes in addition to provenance. Geochemical studies of detrital garnet assemblages have shown a great complexity in provenance that argues against a dominant sediment supply northward from an uplifted central North Sea dome. Much of the sediment was fed laterally, particularly in the Broom and Oseberg Formations. The Rannoch, Etive and Tarbert sequences are dominated by similar suites to those in the Oseberg Formation, implying that most of the shoreface and barrier sands were transported longshore from the east. Ness mineralogy is extremely complex. It has a broadly southerly source (possibilities including the southern Shetland Platform and Horda Platform). Close to the western margin of the basin there are strong northern Shetland Platform influences. The lateral and stratigraphic variation in Ness assemblages argues for deposition by several small-scale river systems rather than one single major river. The strong mineralogical variations provide a basis for reservoir subdivision in most of the studied fields, enable the identification of Ness channels that occur at the Etive level, and identify deposits within the Ness sequence that were derived from the barrier sequence into the Ness lagoonal sequence.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
J. Morris, G. J. Hampson, and G. Maxwell
Controls on facies architecture in the Brent Group, Strathspey Field, UK North Sea: implications for reservoir characterization
Petroleum Geoscience, 2003; 9: 209 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. R. Olsen and R. J. Steel
The significance of the Etive Formation in the development of the Brent system: distinction of normal and forced regressions
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 172: 91 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]