Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mearns, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1992; v. 61; p. 213-225;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1992.061.01.12
© 1992 Geological Society of London

Samarium-neodymium isotopic constraints on the provenance of the Brent Group

Euan W. Mearns

Instituttet for energiteknikk, PO box 40, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
Isotopic Analytical Services Ltd, PO Box 219, Aberdeen AB9 8LL, UK

Samarium-neodymium data for the Brent Group of Gullfaks oilfield provide a detailed record of provenance. The Broom Formation, yielding relatively high Sm-Nd ages in the range 1700–1800 Ma, is interpreted as being derived from a proximal southwesterly source on the Shetland Platform. The Rannoch and lower Etive Formations, having lower Sm-Nd provenance ages (1550–1650 Ma) than the Broom, are interpreted in terms of easterly provenance involving transport westwards to Gullfaks by marine currents. The upper Etive Formation returns to the proximal southwesterly source. This source area grew southwards during initial deposition of the Ness Formation to encompass the Forties volcanic centre resulting in young Sm-Nd provenance ages in some Ness strata. Provenance ages in the upper Etive-Ness section thus have a large range from 1300 Ma to 1800 Ma. It is therefore suggested that the Brent Group was deposited by at least two major river systems: one draining an easterly source in southern Norway and the other draining a proximal southwesterly and southerly source in the Shetland Platform and the central North Sea.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. R. Olsen and R. J. Steel
The significance of the Etive Formation in the development of the Brent system: distinction of normal and forced regressions
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 172: 91 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]