Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yielding, G.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1991; v. 56; p. 79-89;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1991.056.01.06
© 1991 Geological Society of London

Seismic and Subsurface Studies

Seismic reflections from normal faults in the northern North Sea

G. Yielding, M. E. Badley & B. Freeman

Badley Ashton & Associates Limited, Winceby House, Winceby, Horncastle, Lincolnshire LN9 6PB, UK

Fault-plane reflections from gravity-driven, listric faults in thick sedimentary sequences are well known. However, reflections from normal faults associated with crustal extension are much rarer and less well studied. We discuss a number of examples of such reflections, present on commercial seismic reflection data from the northern North Sea. Some of these examples have previously been described as reflected refractions, but we show that this requires unrealistic velocities within the sedimentary column. Instead, we consider it more likely that these events are true fault-plane reflections. Depth migration and image-ray migration are used to determine the probable geometry of the faults in both cross section and map view. Estimates of the true geological dip remain sensitive to the velocity structure used, particularly that applied to the Triassic half-graben fill. Despite this uncertainty, the depth-migrations show that these faults are composed of two near-linear segments in cross section. The upper parts (in the Jurassic and Upper Triassic section) dip at 40–50°, but the deeper parts (Triassic hangingwall against basement in the footwall) typically dip at 30–35°. Occasionally, reflections indicate that faults continue into the basement with a 30–35° dip. We interpret this fault geometry as originating from two phases of fault movement. Triassic extension caused rotation of sets of initially steep planar faults. Following Late-Triassic-to-Middle-Jurassic thermal subsidence, renewed extension in the Late Jurassic caused the faults to cut up through the overburden at a steeper angle. Without recognition of a two-phase extension history, such faults might be mistakenly interpreted as forming with a listric geometry.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. O. Withjack and R. W. Schlische
Geometric and experimental models of extensional fault-bend folds
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 253: 285 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. Odinsen, P. Christiansson, R. H. Gabrielsen, J. I. Faleide, and A. M. Berge
The geometries and deep structure of the northern North Sea rift system
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 167: 41 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
H. Fossen, T. Odinsen, R. B. Faerseth, and R. H. Gabrielsen
Detachments and low-angle faults in the northern North Sea rift system
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 167: 105 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. D. Van Wees, S. Cloetingh, and G. de Vicente
The role of pre-existing faults in basin evolution: constraints from 2D finite element and 3D flexure models
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 99: 297 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]