Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glenn, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1990; v. 52; p. 205-222;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.052.01.15
© 1990 Geological Society of London

Depositional sequences of the Duwi, Sibâîya and Phosphate Formations, Egypt: phosphogenesis and glauconitization in a Late Cretaceous epeiric sea

Craig R. Glenn

Department of Geology and Geophysics and Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Sedimentary facies, depositional environments and stratigraphic relationships of the Upper Cretaceous Duwi, Sibâîya and Phosphate Formations in Egypt are summarized in order to shed light on the origins and interrelationships between phosphorites and their commonly associated facies. The distribution of phosphorites, glauconitic sands, organic carbon-rich shales, cherts and porcelanites, and bioclastic and fine-grained limestones are correlated in both space and time across the central phosphorite provenance of the country. The correlations are linked by means of sequence stratigraphic analysis and are tied to global eustatic sea-level curves.

Two main depositional realms are inferred from the Campanian lithofacies assemblages: (1) a deeper-water hemipelagic environment accompanying maximum transgression dominated by deposition of phosphorites, organic carbon-rich shales and biosiliceous sediments, which, after maximum flooding, shoals upwards into (2) a progradational stage accompanying sea-level fall, during which oyster banks with brackish back-reef sediments (Eastern Desert) and deltaic sediments (upper Quseir Variegated Shale, Nile Valley) dominated eastern portions of the phosphorite belt, while greensands were reworked seaward from earlier inner shelf sediments in the west (Western Desert). These depositional realms encompass (1) transgressive to lower highstand systems tracts and (2) upper highstand to lowstand progradational wedge system tracts, respectively. The reoccurrence of lower Maastrichtian phosphatic shale, marl and associated phosphorite lithofacies at the top of the sequence indicates repetition of the sedimentary cycle.

Both phosphorites and glauconitic greensands appear to be the result of current winnowing and reworking of authigenic grains from previously deposited sediments. The resulting deposits range in scale from thin lag layers, to amalgamated beds, to giant sand waves up to 10 m thick. In the Egyptian setting, the common factors linking massive phosphorite and glauconite occurrences may have been the co-occurrence of humid climate, deep lateritic weathering in hinterlands, anoxic bottom waters on the inner shelf, and high fluvial discharge rates of phosphorus and iron. Superimposed on these factors were influences of cross-shelf currents necessary to concentrate authigenic precipitates, and a sea level change, which acted to markedly reduce the diluting effects of siliciclastic detritus during rapid sea level rise, as well as vertically stack ‘authigenic facies’ during sea level fall.