Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1990; v. 48; p. 77-94;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.048.01.08
© 1990 Geological Society of London

Sedimentology

The language of rocks: an example of the use of syntactic analysis in the interpretation of sedimentary environments from wireline logs

C. M. Griffiths

University of Trondheim, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Division of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics, The Petroleum Centre, N-7034 Trondheim-NTH, Norway

The sedimentary sequence as recorded in vertical section, i.e. by boreholes and logged sections, is a very uneven representation of the passage of time. Thick sand sequences may be deposited instantaneously with respect to geological time, whereas thin shales may represent either millions or hundreds of years, depending on their environment of deposition. This uncertainty concerning the relative time values of sedimentary units and the breaks between them adds a certain spice to attempts to correlate rather than match well sequences. Consideration of Gressly’s original facies concept, and the formal application of ‘Walthers Law’ suggests the basis of a sequence analysis tool that can be used to correlate adjacent wells. The syntactic pattern recognition technique demonstrated here is based on the development of a grammar of unit associations, and the parsing of logderived lithology units. The development of stratigraphic syntax is shown for both wireline log and grain-size data, with example taken from the North Sea.