Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herweijer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Eastwood, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1990; v. 48; p. 39-43;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.048.01.05
© 1990 Geological Society of London

Sedimentology

The relevance of dip profiles from outcrops as reference for the interpretation of SHDT* dips

J. C. Herweijer1, C. F. W. Höcker1, H. Williams1 & K. M. Eastwood2

1 Koninklijke Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Volmerlaan 6, 2288 GD Rijswijk ZH, Netherlands
2 Shell UK Expro, Shell Mex House, Strand, London WC2R ODX, UK

The ability of SHDT processing techniques to produce detailed sedimentological information has been evaluated by comparing the data with 3000 ft of cores covering shallow marine, deltaic, lacustrine, fluvial and aeolian sedimentary environments. It has been shown previously that, by using side-by-side processing, realistic sedimentary dip sequences through sedimentary bodies can be obtained from SHDT data under normal conditions. However, optimum results require processing parameters to be chosen compatible with the scale of the sedimentary structures present. Furthermore, post-processing selection procedures are required to remove noise and to identify dips representing foreset inclination which can be interpreted in terms of flow direction and sand body orientation.

The sedimentological interpretation of downhole dips is often difficult. It may be improved by comparison with vertical dip sequences from outcrops. Sedimentary dip profiles have been measured as part of field work carried out in the Pocahontas Basin of Kentucky. Extensive roadcuts not only enable an unambiguous sedimentological interpretation, but also exhibit numerous relict blast-boreholes, in which vertical dip profiles can be measured under conditions similar to downhole logging. The data now available show that even contradictory dip sequences may be a proper representation of the reality. Systematic collection of sedimentary dip sequences will provide guidelines for a realistic interpretation of downhole records of sedimentary dips.


* Mark of Schlumberger