Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rønningsland, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1990; v. 48; p. 273-286;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.048.01.23
© 1990 Geological Society of London

Identification of Faults and Fractures

Structural interpretation of dipmeter results in the Gullfaks Field

T. M. Rønningsland

Norsk Hydro Exploration and Production, P.O. Box 200, N-1321 Stabekk, Norway

Dipmeter interpretation has been carried out on seven wells from the Gullfaks Field. Orientation and style of major and associated minor faults have been investigated using dipmeter results. Major faults, as inferred from dipmeter data, are in fairly good agreement with faults defined from seismic interpretation. Several less significant dipmeter-defined faults were below the resolution of seismic data. The orientation of these faults probably corresponds with that expected of antithetic and synthetic faults associated with the main fault system. Analyses of dipmeter results indicate little or no influence of synsedimentary tectonism. Thickness variations of the different formations can be explained by post-depositional faulting (fault cut-out) and erosion. The differences in structural dip between the seven wells support the interpretation that they are located on separate fault blocks. The density of detected faults, one per 140 m (from dipmeter results), proves the presence of an intensely faulted area. This study therefore emphasises the importance of using dipmeter results as a supplement to seismic for the purpose of structural interpretation.