Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teyssen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1989; v. 46; p. 79-92;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.046.01.09
© 1989 Geological Society of London

Stratigraphic Patterns

A depositional model for the Liassic Minette ironstones (Luxemburg and France), in comparison with other Phanerozoic oolitic ironstones

T. Teyssen

Shell Research BV, Volmerlaan 6, 2288GD Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Petroleum Development Oman, Exploration Department, PO Box 81, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Oolitic ironstones generally mark the top of a regressive, coarsening- and shallowing-upward depositional megasequence. The iron ooids themselves are preferentially formed during sea-level lowstands or in condensed sections. This general model is valid for the Minette iron formation which was deposited in Toarcian and Aalenian times at the north-eastern margin of the Liassic Paris Basin in a near-shore, shallow marine, mostly high-energy environment. The top of the regressive sequence shows intraformational reworking. The Minette, however, is a remarkably thick unit (up to 60 metres), also internally composed of coarsening-up sequences. In many places these sequences represent large-scale subtidal sand waves, elsewhere large subtidal shoals advancing over their distal finer grained facies. Strong tidal currents building up large sand waves are preferentially active during transgressions. For the Minette base level rise events (transgressions) are therefore required at the top of a base level fall sequence (regression). This apparent discrepancy can be resolved when considering the tectonic setting. Reactivation of structures of the underlying Variscian basement led to subsidence events in syndepositionally formed troughs. This model can explain a high aggradational potential and deposition of thick ironstone deposits at the top of a regressive sequence while erosion took place laterally along the same palaeocoastline.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. H. S. Macquaker, K. G. Taylor, T. P. Young, and C. D. Curtis
Sedimentological and geochemical controls on ooidal ironstone and 'bone-bed' formation and some comments on their sequence-stratigraphical significance
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 103: 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]