Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1989; v. 46; p. 51-63;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.046.01.07
© 1989 Geological Society of London

Stratigraphic Patterns

Eustatically controlled ooidal ironstone deposition: facies relationships of the Ordovician open-shelf ironstones of Western Europe

T. P. Young

Department of Geology, UNCC, PO Box 914, Cardiff, CF1 3YE, UK

Ooidal ironstones are a characteristic feature of the Ordovician successions of south-west Europe and adjacent areas. They occur in shallow marine clastic sequences deposited on a broad low-topography shelf. Three stratigraphic intervals have a particularly widespread development of ironstones: the early Llanvirn, the early Caradoc and the early Ashgill. These intervals, corresponding to periods of major global eustatic sea-level rise, are marked by the development of thin, but persistent, ooidal ironstones even in relatively offshore areas. The ironstones produced by these three events have been studied in the previously contiguous areas of central Portugal and Armorica.

The development of the ironstones, and the nature of the successions within which they occur, show remarkable similarities among the three horizons; this recurrence of similar sedimentary facies defines a cyclicity. In each of these ‘first-order’ cycles the upper part is characterised by the occurrence of a second order of cyclicity, represented by asymmetric coarsening— and thickening—upwards sequences of siltstone and sandstone tempestites, commonly capped by phosphatic conglomerates. The latest ‘second-order’ cycle in each case is characterized by a more distal sequence of dark mudstones with graptolites. The chamositic ooidal ironstones lie disconformably above these upper mudstone-dominated cycles, and are interpreted as forming during ‘second-order’ transgressions late in major global transgressive events. Both ‘first-’ and ‘second-order’ sedimentary cyclicity is attributed to eustatic variation. The ‘first-order’ eustatic cycles have a period of 10–15 Ma, and largely correspond to the international stratigraphic series, while the period of the ‘second-order’ cycles is estimated as 0.2–0.5 Ma.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. H. S. Macquaker, K. G. Taylor, T. P. Young, and C. D. Curtis
Sedimentological and geochemical controls on ooidal ironstone and 'bone-bed' formation and some comments on their sequence-stratigraphical significance
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 103: 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]