Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1989; v. 43; p. 215-222;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.043.01.14
© 1989 Geological Society of London

Implications of thermal and baric structure for controls on metamorphism: northern New England, USA

Howard W. Day

Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

C. Page Chamberlain

Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA

Isograds and bathograds define an apparent thermal and baric structure of the Appalachian metamorphic belt in northern New England. Peak metamorphism occurred primarily during the Devonian Acadian orogeny at about 390 Ma. Kyanite-sillimanite metamorphism took place along heating-decompression paths and andalusite-sillimanite metamorphism is consistent with isobaric heating or limited decompression during heating. Isograds were deformed by early nappes and late domes, and dip steeply in some areas. The aluminium silicate bathograd dips gently east towards lower preserved pressures, intersects the regional trends of isograds, and is deformed by late cross-folds. Argon ages of micas as young as 250 Ma in the highest grade rocks record a long postmetamorphic cooling history, whereas lower grade rocks record much older argon ages. Comparison of these observations with simple thermal models suggests that differences of uplift history did not dominate the prograde metamorphic history and that spatial variations of the pre-tectonic thermal regime or of thermophysical characteristics of the lithosphere were important influences on the observed metamorphism.