Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Amit, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1987; v. 35; p. 157-169;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.035.01.11
© 1987 Geological Society of London

Aeolian Sediments: Dust Dynamics and Deposits

Rates and modes of dust accretion and deposition in an arid region—the Negev, Israel

R. Gerson & R. Amit

Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

Rates of dust accretion and deposition are dependent on the amount of available dust and the trap efficiency of a particular site. Several types of dust-trapping terrains are widespread in deserts: (1) Gravelly (Serir) surfaces that turn with time into Reg soils; (2) vegetated surfaces in the desert fringe that may turn into löessial terrains; (3) stabilized sand dunes; (4) playa surfaces. Loessial terrains exhibit a high rate of dust accretion during the late Pleistocene—0.07–0.15 mm a–1 on the interfluves and ≤0.5 mm a–1 along the flood plains. Gravelly surfaces usually trap about 0.1 mm a–1 of dust initially but the rates decrease to several µm a–1 due to plugging with dust and salts and may ultimately remain constant as a gravel-free B horizon develops. The amounts of imported dust, from both local and distant sources, have changed during the Quaternary due to climatic fluctuations. Roofless ancient building—most efficient dust traps—show that although large amounts of dust were available (much of it from local sources) during the late Holocene, there was not intensive dust accretion during this period due to increasing aridity and decreasing trap efficiency. Wash and gullying led to destruction of the once widespread efficient trapping terrains.