Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murrell, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andriessen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2009; v. 324; p. 73-85;
DOI: 10.1144/SP324.6
© 2009 Geological Society of London

Part I: New approaches in thermochronology

Calibration and comparison of etching techniques for apatite fission-track thermochronology

G. R. Murrell1,2, E. R. Sobel3,*, B. Carrapa3,4 & P. Andriessen1

1 Faculteit der Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Present address: Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3006, USA
3 Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24, 14476, Golm, Germany
4 Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3006, USA

* Corresponding author (e-mail: sobel{at}rz.uni-potsdam.de)

Understanding time–temperature histories using apatite fission-track thermochronology involves sample preparation, analysis and then thermal modelling using an appropriate annealing algorithm. A subtle point in this sequence is ascertaining that the sample preparation utilized is compatible with the methodology used in obtaining the data for constructing the annealing data set. This issue is important if one wishes to utilize the relatively new multikinetic annealing algorithm of Ketcham et al. that is implemented in their AFTSolve and HeFTy models which is based on a different etching recipe than those previously used. A preliminary calibration step involves comparing published etch pit diameters for a suite of samples with those analysed by an operator. Results show that the operator can reliably reproduce the calibration data set. We then report a laboratory experiment using samples from Finland and Spain that compares the results obtained using two different etching methodologies (7% nitric acid with qualitative etching conditions and 5.5 M nitric acid at constant conditions). The two raw data sets yield variable results. Comparing the two etching methodologies reveals the influence of this procedure on the kinetic parameter Dpar.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
F. Lisker, B. Ventura, and U. A. Glasmacher
Apatite thermochronology in modern geology
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2009; 324: 1 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]