Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vergniolle, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2008; v. 307; p. 125-146;
DOI: 10.1144/SP307.8
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Articles

From sound waves to bubbling within a magma reservoir: comparison between eruptions at Etna (2001, Italy) and Kilauea (Hawaii)

S. Vergniolle

Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Institut de recherche associé CNRS et Université de Paris 7, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France (e-mail: vergniolle{at}ipgp.jussieu.fr)

The 2001 eruption of Etna, prior to the flank eruption, has shown an alternation between episodes rich in gas, composed with a series of Strombolian explosions sometimes leading to a fire fountain, and repose periods. The regular alternation results from the coalescence of a foam trapped in the reservoir and periodically rebuilt prior to each episode. The degassing of a magma reservoir depends on bubble diameter, gas volume fraction, surface area and height of the reservoir. These four parameters are deduced from the measured gas flux, the timescale over which the gas flux decreases and the foam dynamics. The dimensionless foam thickness, 0.76 for a purely Strombolian episode, increases to 0.89 for an episode leading to a fire fountain, indicating a more efficient foam coalescence. At Etna, the bubble diameter, gas volume fraction, surface area and height of the reservoir are estimated at 0.50–0.59 mm, 0.25–0.39%, >0.20 km2 and 97–220 m, respectively. At Kilauea, the excellent agreement between the prediction of the foam model, 0.94–1.2 km2 and that resulting from deformations, 1 km2, reinforces the validity of the foam model qualitatively and quantitatively. The thickness of the degassing reservoir, 16–12 m in 1959, is now 1.3–1.1 km.