Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, C. T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, G. D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2008; v. 302; p. 159-184;
DOI: 10.1144/SP302.12
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Articles

The structure, fabrics and AMS of the Slieve Gullion ring-complex, Northern Ireland: testing the ring-dyke emplacement model

Carl T. E. Stevenson1, Brian O'Driscoll2,3, Eoghan P. Holohan2, Rebecca Couchman1, R. John Reavy4 & Graham D. M. Andrews5

1 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK (e-mail: c.t.stevenson{at}bham.ac.uk)
2 Department of Geology, Museum Building, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
3 Present address: School of Geological Sciences, University College, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
4 Department of Geology, University College, Cork, Ireland
5 Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

A structural investigation of the Slieve Gullion ring-complex, part of the approximately 56 Ma Slieve Gullion Igneous Centre, County Armagh, Northern Ireland was carried out with a view to testing the ring-dyke emplacement mechanism. This investigation involved the detailed examination and mapping of critical field relationships and the measurement of visible and magnetic fabrics, within the porphyritic rhyolite (felsite) and the porphyritic granite (granophyre) parts of the ring-complex. Set against existing theories for the emplacement of this complex, our investigation failed to find steep outward-dipping fabrics and lineations that would support the emplacement of this ring-complex as a ring-dyke. Instead, we propose that the ring-complex was emplaced as a series of extrusive and intrusive subhorizontal sheets, controlled by a circular zone of deformation, and subsequently domed by the emplacement of the younger central complex. From its gently dipping bulk geometries and a disharmonically folded eutaxitic internal fabric (supported by AMS – anisotropy of magnetic susceptibilty), the earlier rhyolite is reinterpreted as a pyroclastic deposit. The rhyolite was probably deposited against the wall of a subsiding caldera and is now preserved in the SW quadrant of the complex. From primary intrusive contact geometries with pre-Palaeogene country rocks, magnetic fabrics and subtle visible foliations – all of which are gently dipping – the younger and more extensive granitic ring is suggested to have initially been a subhorizontal sheet that is now domed. Only its gently outward-dipping floor is exposed around the ring-complex, and this is for much of its circumference bounded by a circular zone of deformation – a ring-fault. This study highlights the importance of detailed structural investigation in assessing the emplacement of igneous ring-complexes, emphasizing the need to look further than a simple ring-dyke emplacement model.