Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1987; v. 30; p. 473-488;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.030.01.23
© 1987 Geological Society of London

The Ilímaussaq intrusion—progressive crystallization and formation of layering in an agpaitic magma

Lotte Melchior Larsen & Henning Sørensen

Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Geologisk Centralinstitut, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Agpaitic rocks form the major part of the Ilímaussaq intrusion in S Greenland. The agpaitic magma developed as the narrow top zone in a large stratified basalt-syenite magma chamber at depth. The extreme composition of the agpaitic magma is related to an unusually high crustal position of the cupola. After emplacement, the agpaitic magma developed in an essentially closed system. The magma chamber was shallow and the volatile-rich alkaline magma was light and fluid. Heat loss was mainly through the roof, and the earliest agpaitic rocks crystallized successively downwards from the roof. The magma was probably well mixed in the early stage, but there is evidence for accumulation of residual components in a layer below the roof. This accumulation of low-melting components eventually suppressed the downwards crystallization of the roof rocks. The exposed floor rocks, kakortokites and lujavrites, are younger than the roof rocks, and at this stage the magma had probably developed repeated layering. The layering in the kakortokites, with density-graded units 7 m thick repeated continuously over the whole exposed floor, can be simply explained if they formed from a layered magma by successive upwards crystallization of individual layers. The magma at this stage was nearly volatile saturated, and each layer crystallized in response to the upward loss of a certain amount of volatiles. The lujavrites conformably overlie the kakortokites and formed after a roof collapse which caused the rate of heat loss from the remaining magma to increase. The upward crystallization became faster than the upward transport of residual components, and the successive lujavrites contain more and more of these components which finally gave rise to potentially economic concentrations of U, Be and other rare elements. Finally, a hydrothermal phase was lost from the system.