Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bott, M. H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1969; v. 3; p. 275-283;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1969.003.01.14
© 1969 Geological Society of London

Other Analyses

Orogeny in relation to crust and upper mantle

Professor M. H. P. Bott

Department of Geology, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham

Seismic observations show that young fold mountains are typically associated with thickening of the crust, and normal P-wave velocity in the top-most mantle. Gravity observations show that fold mountains are in approximate regional isostatic equilibrium. The gravity and seismic observations together show that the density in the upper mantle beneath the mountains is not strongly anomalous. In these fundamental respects fold mountains differ greatly from ocean ridges and plateau uplifts (such as western U.S.A.). Beneath ocean ridges and plateau uplifts the crust is not thickened but the upper mantle has anomalously low density and seismic velocity.

The structure of the crust and upper mantle beneath mountain ranges can be explained by crustal shortening amounting to about half the width of the range; on this hypothesis the primary cause of the mountain range is horizontal compression. Alternatively, the root may have been added to the crust by differentiation from the mantle, the mountain range being primarily formed by vertical movement The crustal-shortening hypothesis has been greatly strengthened by the near-proof that large horizontal displacements related to continental drift have affected the ocean crust, and by the increasing realization that mantle convection is a mechanically valid hypothesis. Further indirect support for crustal shortening comes from energy considerations—for instance the gravitational energy associated with dissipation of a root by vertical uplift appears to be inadequate to explain the present-day energy release by earthquakes.