Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoneley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1969; v. 3; p. 215-238;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1969.003.01.11
© 1969 Geological Society of London

Other Analyses

Sedimentary thicknesses in orogenic belts

R. Stoneley, M.A. F.G.S.

The British Petroleum Company Limited, Britannic House, Moor Lane, London E C 2

The evidence provided by certain examples of thick sedimentary sequences, both deformed and undeformed, suggests that at least some of the geotectonic processes can be isolated whereby they are accommodated. These are (a) isostatic depression of oceanic crust by sedimentary loading, (b) down-dragging and compressional warping due to tangential crustal and sub-crustal displacements and (c) crustal foundering resulting from vertically acting changes in the mantle and/or lower crust. All three of these factors must be involved to some extent during the evolution of an orogenic belt but some features, such as the subsidence of a miogeosyncline under tension, are still difficult to explain. Within many Alpine orogenic zones, large thicknesses of sediment are found in miogeosynclines, eugeosynclines, flysch troughs and molasse basins but these four environments are not recognizable in all orogenic belts, particularly the older ones. Comparisons between different belts are not always meaningful in the framework of existing geosynclinal concepts and terminology, but it is expected that a new and comprehensive terminology, based on geotectonic considerations, may shortly become possible.