Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kriwet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Klug, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2008; v. 295; p. 55-70;
DOI: 10.1144/SP295.5
© 2008 Geological Society of London

The Break-up of Pangaea: Jurassic and Cretaceous

Diversity and biogeography patterns of Late Jurassic neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii)

Jürgen Kriwet & Stefanie Klug

Museum of Natural History, Humboldt–University of Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany (e-mail: juergen.kriwet{at}museum.hu-berlin.de)

The regional diversity and biogeographic patterns of Late Jurassic neoselachians at genus level in Europe were analysed based on samples and an extensive literature survey of about 40 localities ranging from the Oxfordian to Tithonian. The simple completeness metric (SCM) displays a quite good fossil record of neoselachians in the Late Jurassic with a peak in the Kimmeridgian. The origination, extinction, diversification and turnover rates were calculated for every stage and indicate that background origination occurred in the Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian with no disappearance of genera. In the Tithonian, background extinction is the main factor for neoselachian diversity decline. The decline in neoselachian diversity at the end of the Jurassic is most probably related to reduced habitats in the course of major regression events, establishment of physical barriers, and climatic changes. Faunal assemblages are quite uniform and mostly agree well with the contemporaneous palaeogeographic situation. Our analyses indicate that both vicariance and dispersal were important processes in the biogeographic pattern of Late Jurassic neoselachians.