Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M. V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2008; v. 295; p. 185-219;
DOI: 10.1144/SP295.12
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Birth of the modern world: the Tertiary

Osteoglossomorpha: phylogeny, biogeography, and fossil record and the significance of key African and Chinese fossil taxa

M. V. H. Wilson1 & A. M. Murray1,2

1 Department of Biological Sciences and Laboratory for Vertebrate Paleontology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada (e-mail: mark.wilson{at}ualberta.ca)
2 Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, Canada

The Osteoglossomorpha are a clade of primitive teleostean fishes with modern representatives in five biogeogeographic regions and fossil representatives on six continents. The centre of modern diversity is in Africa but the centre of fossil diversity is in E Asia. Key fossil taxa include: {dagger}Phareodus, {dagger}Joffrichthys, and {dagger}Ostariostoma in N America; {dagger}Lycoptera, {dagger}Paralycoptera, and {dagger}Huashia among others in E Asia; {dagger}Brychaetus and possibly {dagger}Thaumaturus in Europe; {dagger}Palaeonotopterus, {dagger}Singida, and {dagger}Chauliopareion in Africa; {dagger}Tavernichthys in India; and {dagger}Musperia in SE Asia.

Morphological phylogenies to date have disagreed on three main points: the relationships of {dagger}Lycoptera, of Pantodon, and of Notopterids and Mormyrids. Molecular phylogenies have similarly differed on the last two points. In this study a combined set of morphological data was generated from previous studies, including data from three recently described or redescribed taxa (the African {dagger}Singida and {dagger}Chauliopareion and the Chinese {dagger}Xixiaichthys) and maximum parsimony was used to generate a revised hypothesis of relationships. Our analysis recovered {dagger}Lycoptera, {dagger}Paralycoptera+ {dagger}Tanolepis, and {dagger}Xixiaichthys as stem-group osteoglossomorphs, {dagger}Singida as sister to Pantodon within Osteoglossidae, {dagger}Chauliopareion as a stem osteoglossid, {dagger}Ostariostoma as a stem osteoglossiform, and Notopteridae as sister to Mormyroidea and {dagger}Palaeonotopterus.

These results do not lend themselves to easy explanations of osteoglossomorph biogeography involving either dispersal from a centre of origin or vicariant division of a widely distributed ancestor. Recent suggestions of an ancient (Palaeozoic) origin for osteoglossomorphs are flawed. The evidence, instead, is consistent with an origin within the Mesozoic and the biogeographic explanation involves extensive extinction of clades from continents where they occurred in the past.