Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galán, G.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2008; v. 293; p. 121-153;
DOI: 10.1144/SP293.7
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Types of metasomatism in mantle xenoliths enclosed in Neogene-Quaternary alkaline mafic lavas from Catalonia (NE Spain)

G. Galán1, V. Oliveras1 & B. A. Paterson2

1 Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici C (sur), 08193 Bellaterra-Barcelona, Spain (e-mail: gumer.galan{at}uab.es)
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK

Mantle xenoliths in within-plate alkaline mafic lavas from NE Spain are mainly anhydrous spinel lherzolites and harzburgites, grading into each other, and subordinate pyroxenites. Peridotites followed an earlier melt depletion caused by mantle decompression and subsequent metasomatism. Two main types of metasomatism are differentiated affecting mainly the harzburgites: a silicate-melt metasomatism of Fe–Ti type and a carbonatite metasomatism. Both types are recognized in the nearby Pyrenean peridotite massifs, but the presence of hydrous minerals is less frequent in the xenoliths. The two metasomatic styles could have been generated by the intrusion of Cretaceous alkaline magmas, if a chromatographic fractionation–reaction process at decreasing melt mass took place. This would account for the evolution of the original alkaline silicate percolating melt towards a carbonatite-rich melt, allowing the coexistence in both space and time of the two metasomatic styles. Metasomatism in lherzolites could be explained in the same way. The pyroxenite xenoliths are interpreted as cumulates from these alkaline basic magmas that crop out in the area as rare camptonite dykes. Interaction with host lavas is minor and could explain the partial melting, enrichment and disequilibrium observed in a deformed composite xenolith and sporadic veins filled with glass.