|
Articles |
1 Fault Analysis Group, School of Geological Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (e-mail: conrad{at}fag.ucd.ie)
2 GNS Science, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
3 Marine and Petroleum Geology Group, School of Geological Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
4 School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, School Office: Cassie Building, University of Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
5 CSIRO Petroleum, P.O. Box 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
6 Present address: Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, Texsas 78713-8924, USA
Post-depositional normal faults within the turbidite sequence of the Late Miocene Mount Messenger Formation of the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand are characterized by granulation and cataclasis of sands and by the smearing of clay beds. Clay smears maintain continuity for high ratios of fault throw to clay source bed thickness (c. 8), but are highly variable in thickness, and gaps occur at any point between the clay source bed cut-offs at higher ratios. Although cataclastic fault rock permeabilities may be appreciably lower (c. two orders of magnitude) than host rock sandstone permeabilities, the occurrence of continuous clay smears, combined with low clay permeabilities (10s to 100s nD) means that the primary control on fault rock permeability is clay smear continuity. A new permeability predictor, the Probabilistic Shale Smear Factor (PSSF), is developed which incorporates the main characteristics of clay smearing from the Taranaki Basin. The PSSF method calculates fault permeabilities from a simple model of multiple clay smears within fault zones, predicting a more heterogeneous and realistic fault rock structure than other approaches (e.g. Shale Gouge Ratio, SGR). Nevertheless, its averaging effects at higher ratios of fault throw to bed thickness provide a rationale for the application of other fault rock mixing models, e.g. SGR, at appropriate scales.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Manzocchi, A. E. Heath, B. Palananthakumar, C. Childs, and J. J. Walsh Faults in conventional flow simulation models: a consideration of representational assumptions and geological uncertainties Petroleum Geoscience, 2008; 14: 91 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. J. Wibberley, G. Yielding, and G. Di Toro Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure: a review Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2008; 299: 5 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Jolley, H. Dijk, J. H. Lamens, Q. J. Fisher, T. Manzocchi, H. Eikmans, and Y. Huang Faulting and fault sealing in production simulation models: Brent Province, northern North Sea Petroleum Geoscience, 2007; 13: 321 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. J. Fisher and S. J. Jolley Treatment of faults in production simulation models Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 219 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Manzocchi, J. J. Walsh, M. Tomasso, J. Strand, C. Childs, and P. D. W. Haughton Static and dynamic connectivity in bed-scale models of faulted and unfaulted turbidites Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 309 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||