Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, H.
Right arrow Articles by Couples, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 292; p. 159-172;
DOI: 10.1144/SP292.9
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Articles

Kinematically-equivalent but geomechanically-different simulations of fault evolution: the role of loading configurations

H. Lewis1, S. A. Hall2, J. Guest1 & G. D. Couples1

1 Institute of Petroleum Engineering and ECOSSE Partnership, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Scotland, UK (e-mail: helen.lewis{at}pet.hw.ac.uk) Also at ECOSSE (Edinburgh Collaborative of Subsurface Science and Engineering), a part of the Edinburgh Research Partnership in Engineering and Mathematics
2 Laboratoire 3S-R, Domaine Universitaire, BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

Geomechanical simulations are used to demonstrate the importance of the way that models are loaded. In this paper the development of permanent damage during faulting using frictional-slip models of a reverse fault is investigated. Although the use of different loads and constraints can produce the same faulted geometry (for the same rock type, and at the same burial depth), the models develop very different stress and strain states. Permanent strain magnitudes and distributions between models are quite dissimilar, including the distributions of permanent dilation and compaction. This work demonstrates that boundary loads and boundary constraints are significant factors in determining what stress and deformation states evolve in the simulation model. The examples also illustrate that final (deformed) geometry alone is a very poor basis from which to predict either stress state or open fracture distribution. Bulk finite strain does not allow a prediction of local principal stress directions, magnitudes, or signs, at least in the vicinity of fault damage zones.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. A. Hall and H. Lewis
A damage domain approach to integration of geomechanics and seismic anisotropy for fractured reservoir characterization
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 173 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Ma, A. Z. Vaszi, G. D. Couples, and S. D. Harris
The link between a heterogeneous model and its flow response: examples from fault damage zones highlighting issues in domain discretization and flow simulation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 337 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]