Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laflamme, M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 286; p. 237-257;
DOI: 10.1144/SP286.17
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Ediacarans

Morphology and taphonomy of an Ediacaran frond: Charnia from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland

M. Laflamme1, G. M. Narbonne1, C. Greentree2 & M. M. Anderson3

1 Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 (e-mail: laflamme{at}geoladm.geol.queensu.ca)
2 1-249 Macdonnell Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 4C4
3 53 Sterling Crescent, St. John's Newfoundland A1A 4J9

The Ediacaran frond Charnia, known mainly from fragmentary leaf-like fronds from around the world, is represented by completely preserved specimens with holdfasts in the Mistaken Point biota of Newfoundland. Previous reconstructions of Charnia from two-dimensional impressions were significantly oversimplified, resulting in three-dimensional reconstructions which highlighted a sheet-like morphology. Overlapping relationships and internal structures are rarely (if ever) preserved, and only through detailed photography together with both landmark and traditional morphometric analyses of numerous complete Charnia specimens can the preservational biases be removed. Charnia is reinterpreted here as having a series of individual overlapping primary branches attached to an internal central stalk, and with individual branches constrained by an internal, organic skeleton and/or attachments between adjacent branches. Three species, C. masoniFord 1958, C. wardi Narbonne & Gehling 2003, and C. antecedens sp. nov. can be distinguished on the basis of length/width ratios and the degree of attachment of adjacent branches. Morphological, taphonomical, and ecological studies at Mistaken Point imply that Charnia was a sessile, epibenthic frond that fed from suspension in this deep-water volcaniclastic setting. Evolution of more rigorous connections between the primary branches allowed Charnia to migrate into more turbulent, shallower-water habitats by the late Ediacaran.