Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhalai, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 283; p. 77-91;
DOI: 10.1144/SP283.7
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Articles

Landslide susceptibility assessment for St. Thomas, Jamaica, using geographical information system and remote sensing methods

S. Miller1,2, N. Harris2, L. Williams2 & S. Bhalai2

1 Department of Geography, University College Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK (e-mail: s.miller{at}chester.ac.uk)
2 Mines and Geology Division, Ministry of Lands and the Environment, Hope Gardens, Kingston 6, Jamaica

The St. Thomas district of Jamaica is prone to slope failure, which has resulted in extensive damage and in some cases loss of life. To reduce the effect from landslides, there was an urgent need to map and assess areas that may be prone to future failure. The interpretation of aerial photographs, together with geomorphological mapping and field surveys, was used to produce inventory maps of the landslides. The factors conditioning the slopes for failure were assessed and a weighting value was assigned to them. The weighting was achieved by using the principle of Bayesian conditional probability. The weighted factors were combined in a geographical information system (GIS) to produce a landslide susceptibility model for the study area. Comparison of the model with the existing landslides showed that 97% of the landslides fell within the high and very high susceptibility zones of the model. Comparison of the model with landslides that occurred during 2002, and that were not used in the construction of the model, shows that 83 of the 89 slides that occurred fell within the high and very high susceptibility zones. The landslide susceptibility model will be one of the first steps in assessing the risks that landslides pose to lives and new developments (housing, agriculture, physical infrastructure) in the region.