Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riedmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Haynes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 283; p. 45-51;
DOI: 10.1144/SP283.4
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Articles

Developments in synthetic aperture radar interferometry for monitoring geohazards

M. Riedmann & M. Haynes

NPA Group, Crockham Park, Edenbridge TN8 6SR, UK (e-mail: michael.riedmann{at}npagroup.com)

In 1993 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry (InSAR) was introduced to the wider remote sensing community with the publication of the interferogram depicting the ground deformation caused by the Landers earthquake. Although the power of interferometry was demonstrated, the conventional technique has not always been applicable in all operational scenarios. Over the last few years, however, a number of technical developments have emerged that provide a higher precision of motion rates, the extraction of specific motion histories, and precise targeting. This paper examines uses of differential SAR interferometry (DifSAR) for monitoring geohazards. Limitations of DifSAR will be discussed: lack of coherence, atmospheric refraction and targeting. It will be shown how some of these limitations can be overcome with persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI), which detects slow ground motion with annual rates of as little as a few millimetres, reconstructing a motion history based on the European Space Agency's SAR image archive. The technique permits the estimation and removal of the atmospheric phase, achieving higher accuracies than DifSAR. PSI relies on the availability of pre-existing ground features that strongly and persistently reflect back the signal from the satellite. However, in highly vegetated regions, PSI may not be applicable because of the lack of natural scatterers. To ensure motion measurement of the ground or structures at targeted locations, the NPA Group is developing InSAR using artificial radar reflectors, such as Corner Reflectors (CRs) or Compact Active Transponders (CATs). Both reflector types are still undergoing validation tests, but results show a high phase stability in both cases.