Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2007; v. 274; p. 7-15;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.274.01.02
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Measuring suspended sand concentration using acoustic backscatter: a critical look at the errors and uncertainties

Chris E. Vincent

School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK (e-mail: c.vincent{at}uea.ac.uk)

Suspended sand concentrations in the near-bed layer of the sea can be estimated using acoustic backscatter systems (ABS) and hence, when combined with velocity, sand transport. ABS measurements are now relatively routine and widely regarded as one of the best tools to help to measure sand transport in coastal seas and estuaries. Potentially the ABS can be used to give estimates of both concentration and sediment size with a vertical resolution of 5–10 mm and a temporal resolution of fractions of a second, but in practice there are many practical limitations to what can be achieved in the field. Often these uncertainties are overlooked or ignored because of the difficulty in estimating their magnitude or of making measurements that are any better. The major limitations and sources of errors in the ABS are discussed, including the influence of sediment size and shape. In moderately to well-sorted sandy environments with appropriate calibration, acoustic estimates of mass concentration should be within ± 30% of the true value.