Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gudmundsson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nilsen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 269; p. 83-108;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.269.01.06
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Ring-faults in composite volcanoes: structures, models and stress fields associated with their formation

Agust Gudmundsson & Kristine Nilsen

Department of Structural Geology and Geodynamics, Geoscience Centre, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidstrasse 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

(e-mail: agust.gudmundsson{at}gwdg.de)

Most ring-faults of collapse calderas are either circular or slightly elliptical in plan view, vertical or steeply dipping, and have vertical displacements from several hundred metres to a few kilometres. Most ring-faults are dip slip. Many, however, are partly dip-slip faults and thus shear fractures, and partly ring-dykes and thus extension fractures. Ring-faults have been modelled using analytical, analogue and numerical methods. While analytical models throw light on some aspects of the conditions for ring-fault initiation, they are too general for detailed analysis of ring-fault development. By contrast, analogue and numerical models, combined with rigorous testing on field data, have in recent years provided many new ideas and improved understanding of ring-fault initiation and development. Here we present numerical models for ring-fault formation in isotropic (non-layered) and anisotropic (layered) host rocks. Magmatic underpressure (below lithostatic) or excess pressure (above lithostatic) as the only loading normally favours dyke injections rather than ring-fault formation. A spherical (circular) chamber in a volcanic field subject to (centimetre-scale) doming, tension, or both, is unlikely to trigger ring-fault formation unless the chamber is located in a very soft (low Young’s modulus) layer or has recently injected dykes. The numerical models indicate that a ring-fault (and a ring-dyke) is most likely to form, in layered as well as non-layered host rocks, in a local stress field generated by a shallow sill-like chamber in a volcanic field subject to doming, tension, or both. The diameter of the chamber must be much smaller than the diameter of the volcanic field subject to doming; in many of the numerical models the volcanic field diameter is three to five times that of the chamber diameter. For a 20-km-wide layered volcanic field, either tension or tension combined with doming may result in ring-fault formation. For a 40-km-wide layered volcanic field, tension is not necessary; doming alone is sufficient to trigger ring-fault formation.