Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 268; p. 221-235;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.268.01.10
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Modeling Channel Flow and Ductile Extrusion Processes

Interpretation of deformation fabrics of infrastructure zone rocks in the context of channel flow and other tectonic models

P. F. Williams1, D. Jiang2 & S. Lin3

1 Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3 pfw{at}unb.ca
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1

Infrastructure zones are essentially horizontal to shallowly dipping crustal-scale zones of non-coaxial flow, with two possible interpretations: (a) a crustal-scale shear zone, transporting upper crust over lower crust and/or mantle (transport flow); or (b) a zone of channel flow in which there is a flux of weak crust between relatively strong upper and lower crust and/or mantle, away from the centre of the orogen. Transport flow has a constant shear sense across the zone, whereas in channel flow the sense of shear reverses across the zone. Channel flow may be driven by extrusion (extrusive channel flow), due to the two channel walls approaching one another, or by a pressure gradient along the channel (normal channel flow), with no convergence of the walls necessary. Arguments based on strain compatibility and mechanics suggest that extrusive channel flow is unlikely. Kinematic vorticity numbers have been used to show that infrastructure and other shear zones have undergone flattening strains, but we show that the numbers are incompatible with extrusion. We also show that in addition to the problems inherent in determining kinematic vorticity numbers from fabric, the numbers cannot be related to bulk flow in mechanically heterogeneous zones, because of flow partitioning. Drag folds are a better indication, albeit qualitative, of whether a zone is thinning or not. They also give a conservative estimate of the minimum accumulated shear strains, and may inhibit strain localization. Like snowball garnets, they indicate shear strains that are so large that the pure-shear-thinning component for a steady-shear zone has to be small.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
L. Godin, D. Grujic, R. D. Law, and M. P. Searle
Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones: an introduction
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 1 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. Grujic
Channel flow and continental collision tectonics: an overview
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 25 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. Beaumont, M. H. Nguyen, R. A. Jamieson, and S. Ellis
Crustal flow modes in large hot orogens
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 91 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. J. Jessup, R. D. Law, M. P. Searle, and M. S. Hubbard
Structural evolution and vorticity of flow during extrusion and exhumation of the Greater Himalayan Slab, Mount Everest Massif, Tibet/Nepal: implications for orogen-scale flow partitioning
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 379 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. D. Carr and P. S. Simony
Ductile thrusting versus channel flow in the southeastern Canadian Cordillera: evolution of a coherent crystalline thrust sheet
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 561 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]