Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gand, G.
Right arrow Articles by Durand, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 265; p. 157-177;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.265.01.07
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Tetrapod footprint ichno-associations from French Permian basins. Comparisons with other Euramerican ichnofaunas

Georges Gand1 & Marc Durand2

1 Biogéosciences UMR 5561, Centre des Sciences de la Terre, Université de Bourgogne, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France georges.gand{at}wanadoo.fr
2 47 rue de Lavaux, 54520 Laxou, France

In order to take into account the studies of the European and American (USA) collections carried out by one of the authors, and of the recent nomenclatural revisions from new footprint discoveries, which have occurred during the last decade, the authors present a critical review of the French Permian palichnofauna. The distribution of the ichnospecies in the stratigraphy of the Lodève Basin, taken as a reference, is outlined. The ichno-associations are then compared with those of other French (Provence), European (Italy, Germany) and USA basins. Based on the ages of different ichnofossiliferous formations, three successive ichnofaunal units can be distinguished in the Permian of Europe. The first developed in the Cisuralian (Asselian to Kungurian). The second is found in the south of France in Kazanian to Lower Tatarian strata, equivalent to the Roadian-Wordian. The third and youngest, dated as Lopingian, is only found in Italy, in the Bolzano Basin. Because of sedimentary gaps, limited observations, sometimes erroneous determinations, and ichnospecies with great vertical distribution, it currently appears that footprints have a low utility for biochronological resolution. Nevertheless, they allow us to discriminate three time intervals in the Permian, as is also the case for skeletal remains.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. G. Lucas and A. P. Hunt
Permian tetrapod footprints: biostratigraphy and biochronology
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 265: 179 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]