Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winship, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gomez, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 263; p. 219-231;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.263.01.12
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Unsaturated Flow

Flow and transport in the unsaturated Sherwood Sandstone: characterization using cross-borehole geophysical methods

Peter Winship, Andrew Binley & Diego Gomez

Department of Environmental Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK

(e-mail: A.Binley{at}lancaster.ac.uk)

Cross-borehole radar and resistivity measurements have been used to characterize changes in moisture content and solute concentration due to controlled injection of 1200 1 of a saline tracer in the unsaturated zone of the Sherwood Sandstone at a field site in Yorkshire, UK. Borehole radar transmission profiles show the vertical migration of the wetting front during the tracer test. Three-dimensional cross-borehole electrical resistivity tomography was deployed to monitor changes over time in resistivity, caused by the increase in moisture content and pore-water salinity due to the tracer. The results show clearly the development of the tracer plume as it migrates towards the water table at a depth of 10 m. The tomographic results reveal the impact of a hydraulically impeding layer between a depth of 8 and 9 m. Geophysical and geological logs acquired at the site support this conceptualization. By combining the resistivity tomograms with cross-borehole radar tomograms, changes in pore-water concentration over time have been estimated. Changes in moisture content inferred from the geophysical results were compared with those produced by a three-dimensional unsaturated flow model. Using a sandstone effective hydraulic conductivity of 0.4 m day–1 in the model produced moisture profiles over time that were comparable with those inferred from the geophysical data during the early stages of the tracer test. Differences between modelled and field results were attributed to the impact of hydraulically impeding layers of finer sediments within the profile.